User talk:Abrahamoommen

License tagging for Image:27218154.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:27218154.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 15:05, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:27218154.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:27218154.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Iamunknown 03:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Mar Thoma Church
This refers, to your corrections dated July 8, 2009 to the article Mar Thoma Church.

1. Archidãconus is a Latin word and Arch deacon is an English word. Do you have any citation to prove that in Kerala they were using Latin and English before the arrival of Portuguese on May 20, 1498. In fact they knew only pure Malayalam words and they called their leaders, Malnakara Mooppen, Jaathikku Karthavian, Idavaka Mooppen etc.

2. Persian Cross: You have written that there is a Persian Cross in Thiruvithamcode church, (arapalli). I have been to this church, and have not seen a Persian Cross there. Do you have any proof for this correction? 3. Mar Thoma Church is a continuation of the Malankara Church. The Martoma people were never under a foreign bishop. A large number of people left Malankara Church and joined Antioch in 1876. But members who continued with the Malankara Church added Mar Thoma in its name and are now known as Malankara Mar Thoma Church. If you have any doubt about these facts, please refer ‘’Mulanthuruthi Padiola’’, the agreement signed and submitted to Moran Ignatius Peter III, H.H Patriarch of Antioch by the Malankara Jacobite Syrian Church on June 30, 1876. Details are given in “Mar Thoma Sabha Charitram’’, Vol. 2, pp 80-101, by N.M. Mathew. All these documents are in Malayalam. Neduvelilmathew (talk) 17:36, 8 July 2009 (UTC) Dear Mathew, 1. Archdeacons clearly existed in the Church of the East and everyone know that Church of the East ruled Malankara. They might have popularly known as Jaathikku karthavyan, but I dont see any problem in having the same name in Malankara, which prevailed in Persia. 2. Sorry, I have not been to Arapally. But I told that from some photos I have seen on Internet. When I am able to retrieve them, I will definitely send to you. 3. How marthoma church can be a continuation. It splitted away from Malankara church. Abraham Malpan introduced western theology and some people joined him and formed Marthoma church. To have continuity, it's very important that you keep the same faith;otherwise the vast majority should change to the new faith. tiruvallite 17:15, 27 July 2010 (UTC)