User talk:Absrich

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gay Mean Girls has been accepted
 Gay Mean Girls, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Gay_Mean_Girls help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Doric Loon (talk) 12:09, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi, congratulations on your first Wikipedia article. I have accepted this at AfC review, because I am convinced the topic is notable, and you have made a good start. However, I have to warn you that it is not yet well enough sourced, and if somebody starts a hostile deletion review it is 50/50 whether it would survive. So you need to get more sources. On problem is that most of the references you have are to Youtube, and Wikipedia doesn't recognize Youtube as a reputable source for verification, because anyone can put anything at all up there. So although it is OK to link Youtube videos when they are relevant, it doesn't count either for demonstrating GNG or for verifying controversial facts. It would help a lot if you could find more print medium reviews, or maybe interviews with the actors. I was a little bothered when I searched the Guardian and the New York Times archives and found neither paper has ever mentioned this series. That's the kind of thing you would need to cement this. Good luck with that. --Doric Loon (talk) 12:21, 14 September 2022 (UTC)