User talk:Abstractrabbit

Welcome!

 * }

March 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Aston, Hertfordshire has been reverted. Your edit here to Aston, Hertfordshire was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://astonvillage.tripod.com/astonvillage/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:01, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Selwyn Goldsmith


A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Selwyn Goldsmith requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"r2"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 大诺史 (talk) 11:33, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs
Thank you for your recent articles, including Briggens House, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:01, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages
Thank you for your recent articles, including Briggens House, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:01, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Women’s Therapy Centre


A tag has been placed on Women’s Therapy Centre requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 23:59, 11 January 2020 (UTC)


 * I have restored this article, and moved it to draft space as Draft:Women's Therapy Centre. Please add references--substantial 3rd party references from reliable sources--and make sure you have explained the significance in words of your own without quotation or paraphrase. Then submit the draft for review. If there are problems, let me know on my user talk page.  DGG ( talk ) 04:36, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Women's Therapy Centre
Hello, Abstractrabbit. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Women's Therapy Centre, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 05:11, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Frederick McKinley Jones
Hello, thanks for your edits to this article. However, when adding items to a section like the further reading section, please do not add items to the top; this is considered queue-jumping and not looked upon highly. In this case I've created an external links section for your YouTube video, per the layout guide. YouTube videos in general don't have a good reputation here, for reasons I'm sure you'll understand, but I don't have a problem with the one you added in this case because it's from an official source and probably has a unique point of view on the article subject. Graham 87 05:29, 19 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the guidance - apologies i'm still learning Abstractrabbit (talk) 20:41, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Women's Therapy Centre


Hello, Abstractrabbit. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Women's Therapy Centre".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:19, 17 February 2022 (UTC)