User talk:Abstruce



 '''Willkommen ! Bienvenue ! добро пожаловать ! 欢迎 ! Hoan nghênh ! Bienvenidos ! ਜੀ ਆਇਆਂ ਨੂੰ ! ! خوش آمدید ! کا خیر مقدم Welcome ! ! ברוך הבא स्वागतम् !'''

'''"Be kind, for everyone You meet is fighting a hard battle." — Philo''' ↓ ''' ⇩

Warning
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jat People, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Please do not remove referenced content or engage in edit wars as this may result in a block. --Sikh- History 07:21, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Re: Janjua Rajput
The page is called Janjua Rajput. If you wish to start a page solely on Janjua Jat Jat or Janjua per se, please do so, but do not cause an edit war on that page. Thanks--Sikh- History 14:38, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Please Try And Understand
This is an encyclopedia. You keep missing that point. The edits you keep making from unverifiable sources are WP:POVish. These kind of edits have been marked in the past by editors and deleted. I have stressed several times to you to read the WP:Manual of Style, but you have not. I cannot therefore help you. Thanks --Sikh- History 13:51, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, that is the nature of religious texts, hence we do not tend to use them in a controversial and referencved manner. As you are well aware, the nature of caste/tribe politics are a moot point. In Punjab and Haryana the Jatts rule politically and assert their dominace leading to resentment by other castes. In Rajasthan and UP, the exact opposite is true, where Jatts are treated fairly badly and resent other castes. It is to avoid such disputes and arguments we use WP:POV in enclyclopedia's such as Wikipedia. We cannot use WP:Synthesis. I hope you understand this. Happy editing. Thanks--Sikh- History 15:22, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Please do not post unverifiable information again, otherwise it will lead to warnings and evetually a block. Thanks--Sikh- History 15:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Patience

 * Hi Fellow Editor, I think I can safely say I have been very,leniant with you, with regard to you editing. Perhaps I am biased because you are Jat, but nevertheless, it is quite clear you do not seem to be interested in the Wikipedian ideal of WP:NPOV. WP:Balance, t articles is vital. You adding leads to articles, from sources like Todd in the lead (that were previously deleted) does not help the situation. It is already quite clear from the bulk of the article that Jats have been kings (hard facts). Why obscure it by adding a questionable lead? You must remeber Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia.--Sikh- History 09:25, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

POV and Jat people talk page
Don't worry about POV in the merge discussion etc. POV is an issue for articles, not talk pages. If no-one expressed a POV in a merge or deletion discussion then very little would get done in those areas. Your comments were civil and they were related to the point under discussion. I see no problem with that at all. Best wishes. - Sitush (talk) 20:48, 21 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank You for the moral support. Thanks! Abstruce (talk) 17:38, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Jat people, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ''Your addition, complete with somewhat personality-based edit summaries, constitutes a copyright violation with a small appended phrase that appears to be original research. Please do not accuse me of POV activity again without good cause.'' Sitush (talk) 09:21, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Kshatriya, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 09:42, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Yadu. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 09:44, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Mass reversions
I am sorry but I have just reverted a lot of your recent contributions to a fair few articles, mostly relating to the Jat people in one way or another. I started out trying to unpick the good from the bad but eventually came to the conclusion that there really was no "good" there. Another user beat me to it on one of the articles, resulting in an edit conflict & a self-revert by me.

You appear to have been told on numerous occasions - here, on other users' talk pages, on article talk pages and via edit summaries - that there are certain policies and guidelines which should be followed when contributing to Wikipedia. These include:


 * 1) maintaining a neutral point of view
 * 2) providing verifiable citations of reliable sources for statements made
 * 3) not infringing copyright
 * 4) not indulging in original research

Your edits have in fact breached all of the above, and more. Please take time to read the various policies. Continuing to act in your present (and long-standing) manner will end up with you being blocked from editing. I'll keep an eye on how you are doing; feel free to ask me for advice or clarification here as I have added this page to my watchlist. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 10:13, 23 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Please note that while all of the above are important, I want to highlight the copyright issue, because it's one that is in no way at all negotiable. There is no situation in which you can include a large section of copyrighted text (or images, or whatever) into an article.  We can, sometimes, provide short selected quotations of copyrighted texts, but only if we provide a proper reference and make sure we aren't using any more than absolutely necessary.  The other policies are important, too, but exactly how they apply in any given situation is one that may require interpretation.  Qwyrxian (talk) 23:54, 23 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Abstruce has subsequently re-introduced some of the material I removed for copyvio reasons and has done so in a manner which is acceptable. This is pleasing to see and I hope will become the pattern for the future. I've not checked whether it fulfils the other criteria but, as you hint, breaching copyright policy is a very quick route to waving goodbye here. - Sitush (talk) 00:00, 24 May 2011 (UTC)


 * AFTERMATH:

My  APOLOGY  to Sitush, and the administrator of the article Jat people: Sitush, I apologise to You and the Administrator of the article Jat people about this incident. I admit that due to My lack of knowledge of Wikipedia policy or guideline, I caused this issue here. Honestly speaking, I was interested in this topic about the connection with Yadu, and Lord Krishna, for quite a while, and was seriously looking to contribute in a good manner here; and I was very excited actually, when I located this reference < History of the Jats, Jaitly Painting (sic) Press, foreword, 1968 (Original from the University of Michigan) !!! But, I did breached an important guideline and caused this issue here. When I edited the respective section on the main article, I thought You guyz would be happy to see this, really this is what I was thinking! But, I never realised what I have done until it was noticed and explained on My user talk page by You, and when I did a scrutiny of it all, I realised that You was perfectly right! What I should have done to avoid breaching the guidelines has been suggested above by Qwyrxian for which I am really grateful to him, and I really am. Now, I will take care of the facts stated by You and Qwyrxian in future! I am the one who made an edit that I shouldn't have for which I am really sorry, and accusing You was wrong. I was thinking about this for the past few days, and I have learnt the lesson now, and I assure You guyz that I will be more careful in future while editing a page. Sitush, You been a gentleman throughout, and has also appreciated me after I edited pages following Your suggestions, and I am looking forward to follow them; and I do believe that I will evolve as a better user hereafter! Thanks for being so polite towards me. Abstruce (talk) 17:27, 27 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Dear Qwyrxian, I am thankful to You as well, for Your kind advise. Thanks! Abstruce (talk) 17:42, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. And while I haven't looked at the article yet, if Sitush says the additions are good, then I'll almost certainly agree. Sitush is right about the fact that Wikipedia is very hard.  I find it kind of tricky--we say anyone can edit, all you have to do is start typing, but we only kind of mean it; what we really mean is, "anyone can edit who is willing to learn a bunch of rules". But, as Sitush says below, you'll learn them very gradually over time.  And when you encounter some weird rule you don't know, or a disagreement with another editor about what should be in an article,  as long as we're all talking about it, we can totally figure out the right approach.  It may take time and lots of discussion, but it can be done. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:21, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Recent edits to Kshatriya
Good work with the citations for Jat/Sinsinwar - well done. I had to remove the other bit of your edit due to lack of a citation, but also removed the content around it as that has been there since 2008 without a citation & despite someone requesting one in 2009.

You are free to re-enter the info if you can find reliable cites for it.

You mention overlinking in your edit summary. There is a useful article covering the subject & you may like to take a look - WP:OVERLINK. Nobody expects you to know every Wikipedia policy or guideline but if you nibble at things like this then you will be surprised just how quickly you pick it up. Again, well done. - Sitush (talk) 16:04, 23 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Dear Sitush, You have been a gentleman throughout this. Thank You for Your comments here. I do believe that I will evolve as a better user hereafter! Abstruce (talk) 17:33, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Jats
Can I suggest that for now you revert that huge lump of content you have added to the Jats talk page? It is too much in one go and may in any event be totally unnecessary. Until my question has been answered, it is pointless. If my question cannot be answered then the disputed entry by Ancientindianhistorian is WP:SYNTHESIS and so will not be accepted anyway. That is the quick way to deal with it for now. Your stuff is muddying the waters and will lead to a lot of (probably unnecessary) argument about stuff that simply does not matter. - Sitush (talk) 19:02, 4 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the revert. We can always call it back up later, if needed. I should point out that you used the word "vandalism" in your edit summary. This is a touchy subject and as a new user you will probably get away with it. However, what Ancientindianhistorian added was not in fact vandalism and it is not a great idea to use that word unless you are 100% sure. WP:VAND explains what is and is not vandalism. Might be worth a read before your use the word again. - Sitush (talk) 19:24, 4 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Here's a relevant quote from that page: "Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism. Edit warring over content is not vandalism. Careful consideration may be required to differentiate between edits that are beneficial, detrimental but well-intentioned, and vandalizing. Mislabelling good-faith edits as vandalism can be considered harmful." - Sitush (talk) 19:25, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Jats #2
You added a comment on Jats which is based on pp. 55-78 of The Mahabharata: A Criticism. What is the title of the chapter in which those pages appear? Is it the The date of the Mahabharata War?. - Sitush (talk) 21:17, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you kindly

 * My pleasure! Thanks! Abstruce (talk) 17:32, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Sitush (talk) 00:52, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Disambig at Bhim Singh Dahiya
Are you sure that no disambiguation is needed at Bhim Singh Dahiya? The word Goths usually refers to a tribe from Germany - did they really get as far as India? - Sitush (talk) 08:50, 30 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi Sitush,

Yes, no disambiguation is required over there. Dear Mate, please note that I've only checked that no disambiguation is required over there, and that He's only concerned about the Phonetics, and I am sure about this! About the Goths... well, some scholars do claim this connection! Thanks! Sincerely: Abstruce  ( Talk ) 17:27, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Books LLC
Hi, I have reverted your recent addition of sources published by Books LLC. They are a known mirror of Wikipedia, who use content from our articles in their own books. As such, they are not verification for anything here because there is a risk of circular referencing. The issue has been discussed on many occasions at the reliable sources noticeboard. - Sitush (talk) 17:13, 26 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi Dear Sitush, uuuuummm... OKAY!  Abstruce  ( Talk ) 17:25, 26 September 2011 (UTC)


 * It's tricky - you'll learn how to spot a good source as you go along. As a tip, the same problem I mention above applies to books published by Gyan and ISHA Publishing & so it is best to avoid them also. Keep contributing, and keep looking for some sort of verification for those statements. - Sitush (talk) 17:27, 26 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi Sitush, thanks...!  Abstruce  ( Talk ) 17:33, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Category:Raëlian terms
Category:Raëlian terms, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 21:58, 22 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Dear Mike Selinker, Thank You for notifying this one to Me. I have shared My views over the subject. Please visit: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2012_December_22&diff=529698936&oldid=529659802 . Thanks !! -- Abstruce  ( Talk ) 08:52, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jabir Raza, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages University Grants Commission, Sultan Mahmud and Turkish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 13 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank You for notifying these ones to Me. Notified; I shall fix them right away !! Thanks !!  ← Abstruce  ( Talk ) 11:45, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Canadian British-Israel Association


The article Canadian British-Israel Association has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication or evidence of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  PK T (alk)  13:30, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Rajput
Sorry, Abstruce, but your recent edits to Rajput are not acceptable in my opinion. In some cases, the points you raise have already been discussed on the talk page and in others, well, you are in the realms of fantasy and fringe theories. I am sure that you and I (Sitush) have been through this before also. I am currently unwell and not doing much on wikipedia but when I return properly I shall be reverting, for example, your puffed-up Hunnic categorisation: it is a claim and one that has no basis in the historic record.--2.219.218.79 (talk) 19:56, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually, a quick review of most of your recent edits makes it seem likely that they'll all end up being reverted. Far too much fringe stuff, far too much unreliable stuff, far too much stating disputed items as if they were undisputed fact. And so on, much of it relating to material that has previously been discussed, some of it on this very talk page.--2.219.218.79 (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Dear Friend, Get Well Soon ←  Abstruce  15:42, 9 February 2013 (UTC)


 * And, Dear Friend, I condemn Your accusations. ← Abstruce  17:45, 10 February 2013 (UTC)


 * You will be getting more, like the one in the next section. Sorry, but we have policies.--2.219.218.79 (talk) 02:48, 20 February 2013 (UTC)


 * My Dear, Dear Friend, I AM gearing-up to thrash Your accusations, Dear Friend. As I said, they as merely accusations, My Dear Friend. You know, when I get-up in morning, first I read Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and then I go for a morning walk. Dear, I AM a Wikipedian as well. ← Abstruce  21:25, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Jatava
Please read WP:COMMONNAME and revert your move of Jatav to Jatava. 420,000 hits for Jatav versus 15,000 for Jatava at Google Search seems to be a no-brainer. The official name is irrelevant here and, in any event, you use a 1961 census report as your basis and that at best does not improved on more modern official lists, which show that the naming varies from state to state and has a greater number of Jatavs than Jatavas. Thanks.--2.219.218.79 (talk) 02:47, 20 February 2013 (UTC)


 * My Dear, Dear, Friend, I Hope You are doing great !! eeeeehhh, I, most certainly, will NOT do that. The reason being, it is sourced by -->> "India. Office of the Registrar General. Census of India, 1961, Volume 15, Part 6, Issue 4. Manager of Publications" (and, most importantly, it's after 26 January, 1950). The census is de facto valid as an official document, and, most importantly, it's after 26 January, 1950. And. Dear Friend, if You are considering to revert that, it is very much likely to be challenged. Thanks !! ← Abstruce  21:17, 20 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Sitush, My Dear Friend, I AM right now having coffee under the sun at Chanakyapuri in New Delhi. And, from here, searching Google Books for "Jatava" returns 9,550 results; and searching Google Books for "Jatav" returns 13,000 results. And, as I said -->> The census is de facto valid as an official document, and, most importantly, it's after 26 January, 1950.

And, Dear Friend, if You are considering to revert that, Your move is very much likely to be challenged. Thanks !! ← Abstruce  07:37, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Why did you undo my changes?
Look, i've noticed, most of the times, you undid whatever i write/edit any page. Do you think, i'm uneducated? If yes, then you're no one to school me. I can have my way. From now on, i'll put "citations" for something i make changes in. And also, do not teach me rules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mywikieditbh (talk • contribs) 12:36, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Ror
Hi, responding to a talk page thread that is well over a year old, as you did here, is rather pointless. Start a new thread if you must, but a lot happens in a year. An additional minor point is that citing Cunningham is not a great idea. Like most so-called experts of the Raj period, he was a bigot, he relied on poor sources and outmoded linguistic analysis, and so on. Yes, I am aware of the ASI connection but that, too, is a politically-motivated exercise. What we need in articles such as this are independent sources of relatively modern origin. The first part of which is also why the "states series" of the AnSI survey headed by Kumar Surehs Singh is not reliable. - Sitush (talk) 01:47, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Rajput #2
In trying to fix your poorly-placed contribution to Rajput, I misread the source. That is my mistake, sure, but please do not ever say that I have not read the source. Please assume good faith, especially since one of the few things that people respect me for on Wikipedia is my willingness to dig deep and thoroughly through sources. It was simple human error, that's all. It would be good if that section could be expanded, in particular because the entire Gurjar issue is extremely contentious and there are a lot of fringe theories around, including some from otherwise-respected academics. - Sitush (talk) 18:10, 6 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Well, Dear Friend Sitush, till this very specific moment, I consider the conclusion by Professor Kurbanov (most specifically on origin of Rajput people), to be, bang on target. Thanks !! ← Abstruce  18:58, 6 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Please watch out for WP:3RR. You are becoming unnecessarily combative - no-one involved has ever doubted the reliability of Kurbanov. - Sitush (talk) 19:14, 6 April 2013 (UTC)


 * ""True genius without heart is a thing of naught - for not great understanding alone, not intelligence alone, nor both together make genius. Love! Love! Love! That is the soul of genius.""

- Nikolaus Joseph von Jacquin ← Abstruce  07:05, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Synthesis
I do not have time to deal with the Jat/military issue right now but you can indulge in some self-help by reading WP:SYNTHESIS. The contribution will be removed or rephrased, depending on what the sources say. - Sitush (talk) 20:54, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Dear Friend Sitush, I have read WP:SYNTHESIS before as well; however, I AM reading it once more (as suggested) by You It's half-past 2 a.m. here in India, and on top of that I had just finished watching Gangs of Wasseypur – Part 1 & Part 2 (back-to-back), but anyways, I was successfully able to avoid forgetting the fact that You are having an eye on the "Recent changes" happening to Wikipedia's Articles. So, I had tried to clarify the very issue raised by You in the edit-summary, but anyways, I would not disagree with You, here, about that. But, I have realised that I did make mistake, and I made a little mess of it. I should have done that in the first place, what I did here. But, still, I think there a need of re-phrasing, which I AM doing right-away !! If You are also looking forward to re-phrase the contribution, then I invite You to do that, of-course, depending on what the source says. I think I would like to request You to not to remove the "contribution", because there are reasons why the "contribution" should stay. Thanks !! ← Abstruce  21:17, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Images
How an image looks on the screen depends on your browser, your computing device etc. Usually, we do not meddle with image sizes - if someone wants to see the big picture then they can just click on the image. It might therefore be best to revert your efforts at Jat people - they are entirely subjective and not particularly helpful. - Sitush (talk) 18:21, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi Dear Friend, I have actually "intentionally" reduced the size of a few images on the Article because there are already too much images on the Article and they are covering significantly large area, and I have added one more image of arguably the most notable Muslim Jat. So, I have only helped the situation. Now, they will appear a bit smaller in all browsers !! But, if You may leave Me a new message Please as texted above, I would definitely make a revert. I Am waiting for Your reply, Dear Frend !! And, I suggest that We should get rid of at-least a couple of unverified images (author: unknown). Thanks !! ← Abstruce  18:33, 11 May 2013 (UTC) Jat people: Revision as of 23:13, 11 May 2013


 * I know what you did. You should let them default, ie: remove all specific sizing parameters. Since you think that there are too many images, adding one more is not exactly helpful, is it? If you think any are "unverified" then raise the raise the issue on the article talk page. - Sitush (talk) 18:49, 11 May 2013 (UTC)


 * And is there any chance you might consider increasing the font size here? It is pretty much blinding me trying to read such a small size. - Sitush (talk) 18:50, 11 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Aye-Aye Dear Friend, I would do as suggested in a few moments. Just a few moments, Thanks !! ← Abstruce  18:56, 11 May 2013 (UTC)


 * And, about the fonts: May I respectfully ask You to consider the  'Zoom In'  facility from Your browser ←  Abstruce  07:31, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Krantikari Adivasi Mahila Sangathan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bastar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 10 September 2013 (UTC)


 * I have fixed it !! ← Abstruce  17:50, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Unscientific claims in religious scriptures
Hello, Abstruce,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Unscientific claims in religious scriptures should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Unscientific claims in religious scriptures.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, TheLongTone (talk) 17:08, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

connect
Hi ..is there an email where i can reach you regards a suggestion to one of the pages created by you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.205.204.61 (talk) 12:42, 19 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi, by reading Your above posted message, the first thing that I would like to request You is to read BOLD (as none of the WP Articles created/initiated/started by Me is even semi-protected → Protection policy). I think You should also consider creating a Wikipedia Account (Why create an account?) and try to provide the suggestions at the WP Article's talk pages; and as You go along You are Welcome to ask questions (Questions) (I would honestly try to answer Your questions, as per My understanding) ! You may also want to read Why to contribute? along with other WHYs ? as well. And in between, You may wish to have some Tea as well. ← Abstruce  15:29, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

thanks
i enjoyed the tea very much...created the wiki account but havent a clue how to suggest when u create a "biography page" would be nice to add a photo.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saranyashekhar (talk • contribs) 16:07, 19 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Well, if You have a suggestion that may help improve a WP Article then You should provide Your suggestions at that specific WP Article's talk page. You may want to read 'How to use a WP Article's talk page'. Since You are a newcomer, may I respectfully ask You to once read the links posed by at Your User talk page, before You start Editing. And, You should post related new messages to this section by left-clicking [edit] (just after the title of the section) or here. ←  Abstruce  08:00, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Bhagat Singh. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Please see the talk page and keep things there until you have consensus. Sitush (talk) 12:32, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Dear Friend, You are mistaken !! Kindly read My comments at Talk:Bhagat Singh. Please note that it is abundantly clear that it is You who have breached the three-revert rule (WP:3RR) and the 3RR exemptions (October 2013) . ← Abstruce  16:51, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Untitled
am sorry i tried...making changes to the article u contributed but was afraid i would not do it right..just a simple suggestion...like u have done a biography on Rahul Pandita..a photo would complete the article..thanks.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saranyashekhar (talk • contribs) 15:13, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi, regarding the WP Article Rahul Pandita, I still need to do a lot of work on that WP Article. I would try to add a picture, I will look for one which is free of Copyright (Copyrights). As I suggested earlier, please read the links posted by Benison P Baby at Your User talk page, and kindly post more relevant suggestions for further improvements at Talk:Rahul Pandita (just left-click on Talk:Rahul Pandita). Let's discuss Your suggestions at Talk:Rahul Pandita. Please do Sign (Signatures) Your posts. Thanks !! ← Abstruce  16:46, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Photographs on www.rahulpandita.com are free of copyright should you wish to use them...````saranya```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saranyashekhar (talk • contribs) 11:14, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi, I will have a look at the website, as suggested. But, I do not promise to upload any of Pandita's picture from that website before verifying the copyright status of the pictures. Thanks !! ← Abstruce  12:57, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Islamophobia
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Islamophobia. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Line of succession to the Swedish throne
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Line of succession to the Swedish throne. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kansas gubernatorial election, 2014
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Kansas gubernatorial election, 2014. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Edward Snowden
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Edward Snowden. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kishenji, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freedom fighters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Fixed !! ← Abstruce  14:29, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mafia state
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mafia state. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:United States. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Frédéric Chopin
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Frédéric Chopin. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jimmy McMillan
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Jimmy McMillan. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:LGBT rights in Russia
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:LGBT rights in Russia. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Constitution Party of Alabama
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Constitution Party of Alabama. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

B. S. Nijjar
Regarding this removal, please can you link me to a thread where you saw the comments made by. I've asked that user but he cannot recall it. He has given some reasons in his response to me on his talk page but I'd like to see the thread because this has been an awkward issue for some time now. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 12:37, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi Sitush, I AM thinking about partially reverting You for reverting this Edit. Shouldn't I ?! If not, what purpose did the Tag serve ?! Sincerely, ← Abstruce  06:36, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Health Services Union expenses affair
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Health Services Union expenses affair. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — 10.4.1.125 (talk) 00:09, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ted Nugent
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ted Nugent. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Indian general election, 2014
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Indian general election, 2014. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 18:57, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fort Lee lane closure scandal
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fort Lee lane closure scandal. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Crimean referendum, 2014
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Crimean referendum, 2014. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Sunflower Student Movement
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sunflower Student Movement. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:United States. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Visa policies in the European Union
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Visa policies in the European Union. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gun politics in the United States
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Gun politics in the United States. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox officeholder
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Infobox officeholder. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Politics of the United States
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Politics of the United States. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Operation Green Hunt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fleet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States Senate election in North Carolina, 2014
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:United States Senate election in North Carolina, 2014. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pahlavi dynasty
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pahlavi dynasty. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United National Liberation Front, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conflict (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Fixed !! ← Abstruce  13:23, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Anarcho-capitalism
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Anarcho-capitalism. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pune techie murder case
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Pune techie murder case. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States Senate election in Maine, 2014
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:United States Senate election in Maine, 2014. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mitch McConnell
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mitch McConnell. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Governorship of Chris Christie
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Governorship of Chris Christie. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Republican Party (United States)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Republican Party (United States). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Revolutionary Communist Party, USA
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Revolutionary Communist Party, USA. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Russian Invasion of Ukraine (2014)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Russian Invasion of Ukraine (2014). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Turkish presidential election, 2014
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Turkish presidential election, 2014. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ashok Chakra Award
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ashok Chakra Award. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Application of sharia law by country
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Application of sharia law by country. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Joni Ernst
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Joni Ernst. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited International League of Peoples' Struggle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Illegal and Liberation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:19, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:University of Cambridge
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:University of Cambridge. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Inter-civil war violence in Libya
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Inter-civil war violence in Libya. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Malaysia Airlines Flight 17
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Malaysia Airlines Flight 17. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:House of Assembly of Jamaica
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:House of Assembly of Jamaica. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of states with limited recognition
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of states with limited recognition. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Rahul Pandita moved to draftspace
An article you created, Rahul Pandita, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) The sources you provided are primary and thus, not acceptable. Also, this BLP needs inline citations so that content can be verified. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Dial911 (talk) 03:18, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Rahul Pandita for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rahul Pandita is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rahul Pandita until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 03:40, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Korindo (Raëlian temple)


The article Korindo (Raëlian temple) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not meet WP:GNG at WP:NGEO or WP:ORG"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cambial — <b style="color:#218000">foliar❧</b> 13:09, 25 July 2023 (UTC)