User talk:Abubebsi

NPOV
As reviewing administrator, I saw your page on Terminology used in the Hanbali Madhab. I gather you think the page Hanbali so inaccurate that you need to start a separate page to give what you understand as the correct version. But Wikipedia does not do this. When there are multiple views, we do not make a WP:CONTENTFORK, but discuss the differences on the talk page, and find some way to present the different positions, with their evidence according to the sources. Therefore I have placed a tag to merge the two pages. Please discuss it on the talk page for Hanbali. If the people interested canot cometo agreement, the see WP:Dispute resolution--the best course is to ask for additional opinions.

When there is a disagreement between modern academic views of a subject and traditional religious views, we give both of them, referenced an appropriately indicated. The readers are  the ones to judge--what we do is give the information by which they can judge.  DGG ( talk ) 03:16, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Terminology used in the Hanbali Madhab for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Terminology used in the Hanbali Madhab is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Terminology used in the Hanbali Madhab until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pass a Method  talk  08:28, 10 June 2013 (UTC)