User talk:Abudiman99/Racemic crystallography/Dtbooth Peer Review

The article has a great start, and I think you do a good job of introducing racemic crystallography as a concept. My feedback has more however to do with 2 points; 1. A number of your sources are primary sources, that is you cite a research article directly. While their work may be valuable, Wikipedia values the use of secondary sources over primary sources for the sake of addressing topics including these scientific ones. Try and find a review article which cites the relevance of the work of these different research teams rather than directly just citing their articles, as it evidences a more broad pooling of information on the topic rather than the work of one team in a handful of papers. 2. It would be valuable for the layman Wikipedia reader to know the applicability of racemic crystallography to other fields of study or our greater society. As you are developing a new article, having a smal section added committed to something like this would significantly improve the polish of your article. Thanks, and great work so far! -dtbooth