User talk:Abuisamuhsin

Welcome!

Hello, Abuisamuhsin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! RA 0808 talkcontribs 21:08, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

September 2015
Hello, I'm RA0808. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Hanbali. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. RA 0808 talkcontribs 21:08, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * "I certainly object to the statement that Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that may be considered objectionable. The information is simply inaccurate that supports a biased conspiracy-theory view of the religion of Islam without providing facts. Many of the citations are from non Muslims which in itself should be questioned for accuracy. I don't know why removing a lie constitutes Wikipedia censoring anything. I happen to BE Hanbali and have studied it which is why I know it's accurate. Relations to Wahhabism are erroneous due to the simple fact Wahhabism isn't a movement, it's a term given to absolutely any differing viewpoint a Muslim can have. Nobody in the Muslim world calls themselves Wahhabi, so disparaging remarks against a school of thought shouldn't be taken into consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abuisamuhsin (talk • contribs)"
 * (NOTE: In future, please use talk pages to respond to comments posted on your talk page.) The information that you removed was sourced and the religious beliefs of the authors of those sources is immaterial. You were bold and removed the material, and your bold edit was reverted. This is a normal thing on Wikipedia. Now is a time for discussion at Talk:Hanbali, where you and other editors can develop consensus on if the material that you object to should be removed. Given that you have studied the topic, you will definitely be able to bring some great sources to the discussion and change the article for the better. RA 0808  talkcontribs 21:36, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep the same in mind for Athari or any other article as well. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:16, 28 September 2015 (UTC)