User talk:Aby74

Citrus framework
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Citrus framework, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.citrusframework.org. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:23, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Citrus framework
A tag has been placed on Citrus framework requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Christopher Connor (talk) 09:51, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from ConSol Consulting & Solutions, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Christopher Connor (talk) 09:54, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:16, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Citrus framework
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Citrus framework, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.citrusframework.org. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:20, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Notability
I have seen you post to Talk:ConSol Consulting & Solutions, where you wrote "as i'll write some articles about the open source products (i.e. citrus framework) of this company i guess this site should not be deleted. Btw, there a smaller companies which have a wikipedia-site".

Unfortunately the fact that you intend to write about the products of the company does not justify writing an article about the company. Articles are acceptable only if they are about subjects which satisfy Wikipedia's notability criteria. To see what is involved I suggest looking at the general notability guideline and the guidelines on organisations and companies and reliable sources. Also relevant is the FAQ on organisations.

It is a common mistake among people new to editing Wikipedia to think that "other pages on similar subjects exist, so this one should not be deleted" is a good argument. Unfortunately it isn't, both because there may be significant differences that you haven't realised, and because perhaps the other articles shouldn't exist. A more detailed explanation of this is at WP:OTHERSTUFF, and a longer one still is at Other stuff exists. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:22, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Reply to your query
While I was writing the above comment you posted a query to my talk page saying, amongst other things "Can i recreate it?" The answer is that if you do it will be deleted again unless you can show evidence that it satisfies the guidelines I have mentioned. If you can do so then that will be absolutely fine. However, many people who come to Wikipedia full of enthusiasm are disillusioned and frustrated by continually trying to get their articles accepted, only to see them repeatedly deleted. My advice is that, unless you really have solid evidence of notability, you would be better off putting efforts into editing other parts of Wikipedia. On the whole it is much better to start by making small edits to existing articles. In the course of doing that you will gradually learn what makes a good Wikipedia article, and you will then be in a better position to write new articles yourself. This is, of course, only advice, not instruction, but in my experience editors who start gently are more likely to make a success of their Wikipedia work, and less likely to give up in frustration. Finally, I will (somewhat belatedly) give you a welcome message which gives links to various useful pages, and I also hope you will feel welcome to contact me on my talk page if you have further questions. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:35, 7 July 2010 (UTC)


 * }

11:04, 7 July 2010 (UTC)