User talk:Acags97/sandbox

Article Evaluation - 2014 Fort Hood shooting

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Yes it is relevant, and nothing appears to be distracting. Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? The map is outdated and just copied from the 2009 Fort Hood Shooting. Possibly more information about the victims, but I am unsure if they meet the confidentiality standards Wikipedia mentioned. What else could be improved? Include information about the victims who were injured in the shooting. Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? This article is neutral. Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? The victims seem to be underrepresented with majority of the page focused on the shooter. Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? All links work except one. (Fort Leonard-Wood, Missouri). Sources support article. Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? Only issue is some facts are cited with news articles which is where the majority of information from a shooting comes from, but wiki stated is not the most credible. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? They talk about the issues of finding reliable sources outside of the news. How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? It is a C-class article. How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? It seems to be the same as discussed in class. Acags97 (talk) 16:40, 26 September 2018 (UTC)acags97