User talk:Acaryatid2

May 2021
Hello, I'm Sungodtemple. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Matt DeHart have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Sungodtemple (talk) 00:44, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello Sungodtemple the edits corrected errors in fact which is alwys constructive if accuracy matters.
 * Most of the other sources say the other way. Wikipedia is based on verifiability, not truth. Sungodtemple (talk) 15:20, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Newsweek is a verified source and your it is your opinion about the value of including it. If you can verify errors in Newsweek reporting then you can have some basis to delete verified fact from the posting. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Acaryatid2Acaryatid2 (talk) 18:50, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Matt DeHart. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. –– FormalDude  talk  00:08, 28 January 2022 (UTC)