User talk:Acather96/Archive 2

Jefferson Waterman International
About your tagging here, GFDL has not been a compatible license for importing text since 1 November 2008. See Licensing update for more details. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:27, 24 May 2010 (UTC)


 * OK, thanks :) Acather96 (talk) 19:34, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks dude! (sorry if youre a girl!) =) i loved the cookies! Im also almost new, and am peruvian! =) --Darksmile5 (talk) 20:23, 24 May 2010 (UTC)


 * That's OK :) And really, if you do have any questions, just drop me a line Acather96 (talk) 20:23, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Little Chef
Hi, you have added a pov tag to the article but have not explained the nature of the problem that you thve identified with the article. When adding tags, such as this, you need to explain what the problem is so that other editors can see exactly where the problem is and address it. Without an explanation of the problem the tag should be removed. Thanks. Keith D (talk) 21:43, 24 May 2010 (UTC)


 * The reason I tagged the article was due to previous comments on the talk page, about the article being biased against Little Chef. I am currently trying to get it assesed by WikiProject Food and Drink, and hopefully they will also consider the potential POV problem. I'll leave a note on the talk page explaining my reason. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 06:16, 25 May 2010 (UTC)


 * OK. Thanks for responding. Keith D (talk) 13:11, 25 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Here is more on the B-Class assessment and its definitions: Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 19:01, 25 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks :) Acather96 (talk) 20:05, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Copyright Cleanup
Hello Acather96, and thank you for the award. I appreciate it very much. Have a good day. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 19:35, 25 May 2010 (UTC)


 * That's OK, and have a nice day to :) Thanks, Acather96 (talk)<

Re:May 2010
Thank you for that, just to say I'm not really a big fan of reciving automated messages since I have been here for 2 years. Just to ask, why did you post that comment about edit descriptions? The C of E.          God Save The Queen! (talk) 05:27, 26 May 2010 (UTC)


 * No, thats a good point and I apologise, I don't really like receiving template messages either. And you have been here a lot longer than me, so really I've just violated this, if anyone does this to you again, you may wish to give them this! I originally posted the message, as after looking at who to notify about WikiPolice, you hadn't used any edit summaries. Again, I apologise and have a nice day. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 06:07, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Some connection problem
I faced to some net connection Problem. Again there is available text --Wipeouting (talk) 16:13, 26 May 2010 (UTC)


 * OK, thanks for the swift response. Please do remember to use edit summaries though :) Acather96 (talk) 16:14, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

I want to propose delete Nadini Premadasa flowing this reason. "There are lots of singers in Sri Lanka .There is no any importance to create an article about this person. She has participated to superstar program on TV channel few years ago. But it is not an issue for create an Article on worldwide encyclopedia describing her personal descriptions. Proposed to strongly" But it is not appear on page of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadini Premadasa. could you please help. (Wipeouting (talk) 16:21, 26 May 2010 (UTC))


 * It does mate, as far as I can see...Acather96 (talk) 16:23, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

If it is,What is your response about my suggestion.--Wipeouting (talk) 16:26, 26 May 2010 (UTC)



Addihockey10 has eaten your cookie! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

Mmm.. thank you :) Also, thanks for commenting on my RFA; although unsuccessful, I learnt that I should probably get more experience in more areas first. -- Addi hockey  10  16:54, 31 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the thanks, and better luck next time! :) Acather96 (talk) 18:06, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
You have  new messages ( last change ).  — fetch ·  comms   19:51, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!
Acather96 - Thank for your participation and support in my RfA.

I can honestly say that your comments and your trust in me are greatly appreciated.

Please let me know if you ever have any suggestions for me as an editor, or comments based on my admin actions.

Thank you! 7 23:08, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the talkback, I might not have seen that reply.  Ron h jones (Talk) 19:40, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

UAA
I don't believe either of the two accounts which you've reported to UAA (Fingrelickingpieboy or Mother lover227) are username violations. Please note that UAA is for blatant violations of the username policy. Borderline cases should be discussed with the user directly or discussed at WP:RFCN. If you have any questions, please let me know. TN X Man 16:11, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, thanks for the notice. You are right, I might had been a bit over zealous with the reports. Thank you, as I am only recently started 'patrolling' the user creation log. Acather96 (talk) 17:20, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Dear Acather96
hi there, i have just been acused of spam, the problem is i am new to wikipedia i do not know how to create a new page and ad a link to the new page, would that method be spamming also? please advise, thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amirbdno1 (talk • contribs) 20:51, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey there, and welcome to Wikipedia. Just to clarify, do you want to create a new article on Wikipedia? Acather96 (talk) 20:59, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank spam!
TFOWR 21:11, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

FIR-TEX
Hi Acather96, I have placed the text about FIR-TEX in the subpage you mentioned. i wrote this in the FIR-TEX subject in your archive 1 (maybe the wrong place?) I would like to know if it is good? Thanks for your help, regards Flying Dutchman 21:28, 11 June 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dicky747 (talk • contribs)


 * OK, thats good. Shall I submit it to Afc on your behalf, so we can get some feedback and maybe get it into mainspace...Acather96 (talk) 06:30, 12 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes please, if that is the best way? Flying Dutchman 14:01, 12 June 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dicky747 (talk • contribs)

On Michael Hester
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/worldcup2010/article-1285583/WORLD-CUP-2010-Graham-Poll-Index.html

He in fact IS the worst, and you, as a teenager from the UK, will surely approve of the Daily Mail. Also, under your Rollback Success Section, you wrote "Thank you so much kind admin who's name I cannot remember" the correct word you're looking for is "whose," not "who's." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.68.16.155 (talk) 13:49, 12 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Hey, and welcome to Wikipedia. No, you're right, I assumed that you had simply added hate content. Please feel free to re-add the content with the reference given. Also, remember to adhere to WP:CIVIL, don't be so patronizing. And thanks for the grammar fix :) Acather96 (talk) 13:52, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

With all due respect, Acather96, I don't know why you ask me not to be so patronizing. I gave you what you requested, a reliable source, and to prove that my reference is reliable, I simply spit back what you wrote on your own personal page; you're a teenager from the UK, and given that, I'm more than positive that you're aware of the validity of the Daily Mail. Please adhere to WP:CIVIL, and don't be so patronizing. And you're welcome for the grammar fix :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.68.16.155 (talk) 14:05, 12 June 2010 (UTC)


 * "as a teenager from the UK, will surely approve of the Daily Mail" Maybe you meant it to mean something more civil (and if you did I apologise), this could be (and was) interpreted as a bit of a sterotypical and mildly insilting comment: what does one's age or country of origin have to do with reading preferences? And with regards to the validity of sources, please see WP:SOURCES if you are ever in need of assistance. Lastly, please remember to sign your posts by typing four tidles ( ~ ) Thanks, Acather96 (talk)

I mean no stereotypical insults to you or to anyone from the UK. What I'm saying is that you, a human being of teenage from the United Kingdom, would at least hear of the Daily Mail, since it is published in/about/from the United Kingdom. You don't have to prefer reading the Daily Mail. All I'm saying here is that the Daily Mail follows the guideline provided by the Wikipedia as a valid source, and I know I didn't have to explain that since you and the publishing of the Daily Mail are of the same nation. I mean absolutely no insult to you. Again, thanks for your help and corrections. 99.68.16.155 (talk) 14:31, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks. I guess it is not present in California, but in the UK there is quite a big stereotype :) I am glad we could sort this put civilly, apologies if I did not assume good faith, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! Acather96 (talk) 14:38, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Wikiproject Bedfordshire
Hey there!

Yes I would love to be involved with a revived Wikiproject Bedfordshire! Bleaney (talk) 21:16, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm still interested too. I haven't been very active on Wikipedia lately, but always relish a challenge... Bogbumper (talk) 21:55, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Me too, I'm in if there is something I can help with - I've mainly been working on the villages around Clifton. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Plingsby (talk • contribs) 16:26, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Fair Trade Wales
Hi Acather96,

I am a bit confused that yousay my post contained copywrited material as I wrote the original material it was copied from! My concern was COI but I feel I made a good case for inclusion anyway and no feed back on this aspect was left.

I am still very to to this so feedback is appreciated.

FairTradeWales (talk) 19:43, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


 * So did you write the text here? Acather96 (talk) 19:45, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Rejected?
Don't understand how the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/CitySights_NY got rejected, meanwhile another tour company's page looks A LOT more like an advertisement but theirs is approved??? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncle_Sam%27s_New_York

Doug Citysightsnyc (talk) 19:57, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


 * On second thoughts, that is a good point, will un-decline and place on hold. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 19:59, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

I made the change to the sentence as suggested by other reviewer —Preceding unsigned comment added by Citysightsnyc (talk • contribs) 15:26, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/This_is_a_magazine
hi. could you point out exactly which words or terms are causing the problem? i know some cites are missing still (im tracking them down) but i thought it was for the most part ready. sorry if im a little new to this. thanks! Robby81 (talk) 21:35, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I think it's all OK now though, as the article has been created. Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 08:16, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Rock-It-Ball neutrality
Hi. I hope I can help throw some light on this. I'm PMHildreth and yes, I am *one* of the founding fathers of Rock-It-Ball, and yes I have edited the Rock-It-Ball page. I didn't start the Rock-It-Ball page on Wikipedia. I don't know who it was who did that - however, when I found someone had done the Rock-It-Ball page I added some bits in to complete the picture. Later on I saw that a number of issues had been flagged up (external references required, it needed to be wikified etc.) In particular I noticed that it asked for contribution from an expert on the subject. As the sport had grown, had administrative bodies etc and I had been involved from the early days and have maintained the archives I consider myself an expert in this field so I redrafted the whole thing. I looked at other pages and took great care (a) to structure it correctly (b) to be neutral and accurate in what I wrote (c) to provide external links and references (d) to not make any exagerated claims (it's not commercial or an advertisement - I wanted to help develop a clear factual entry about the sport).

The page suffered from vandalism at one point from someone who seemed to have a personal grudge against two of the players mentioned. That got sorted and I'm grateful to Wikipedia for the help we received.

Since then it seems to have come under attack from user bucktrout - to start with he inserted the 'controversy' section. The sport has not been accused. The controversy involves 4 individuals. I've looked on Football pages - there is no mention of Harry Redknapp's legal problems nor Frank Ribery's being accused of sex with an under-age girl. Details of Harry Redknapp's legal issues are on the Harry Redknapp page. On the tennis page I didn't see anything about the accusations against a young England tennis star. So I would question why bucktrout would put issues about individuals on the page about the sport? I didn't remove it however, I simply corrected an inaccuracy. Now there is the non-impartiality accusation by the same user. He claims that the page focuses on the size of the sport which is untrue - this is covered in one small introductory section. He also states that it focuses on the sports records which are not verifiable - all of the records are verifiable and accurate. I can only repeat, I redrafted the whole page because of Wikipedia's request for expert input and to meet Wikipedia's other requests and I made every effort to be accurate. I guess I could have created myself another account to hide my identity which would have prevented bucktrout from making the accusations - but I'm just not like that. I honestly thought if I just stated the facts as they are there wouldn't be a problem.

I hope this helps you. 85.211.72.25 (talk) 10:36, 18 June 2010 (UTC)


 * First of all, thank you very much for your extremley detailed reply, it is nice to see a user get this involved when,really,they have nothing to gain. Regarding the vandalism and/or edit wars, it may be useful taking any concerns you have to dispute resolution. I can see your point regarding the controvesy section, though once again, I think dispute resolution could help you get some results. Thanks once again, Acather96 (talk) 07:17, 20 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi. Thanks for your reply.  As regards the vandalism - that was sorted out.  I haven't tackled the issue of bucktrout's contribution to the page.  That's for another time.  My concern in my reply really was to address the neutrality issue - I acknowledge that I am one of the founding fathers of the sport but felt it was OK for me to edit the page as expert contribution was actively being solicited and I didn't write anything that was inaccurate or exagerated.  I am delighted when others make contributions to the edit, (that's the idea of Wikipedia, of course) as long as there doesn't appear to be a negative motivation. I hope I have allayed any concerns about neutrality.  Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.211.72.25 (talk) 17:30, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

85.211.72.25 (talk) 17:30, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

RfA
Thank you very much for your contribution to my Rfa. I have made a comment about it at User talk:JamesBWatson which you are, of course, very welcome to read if you wish to. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:48, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Images
I've been on Wikia wikis for a while and there image uploading is easy and dynamic. Here however, I have no clue how to upload images. Could you please explain to me how? I find it a bit odd that there is a button for images and flash but I cannot find out how to upload them to the site itself and I'm almost certain that I can' use the img tag. BobaFett2 (talk) 17:05, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * At the moment, you can't. To upload images, you need to be autoconfirmed. You could just wait for this to happen, or you could:


 * 1) Request that you become confirmed now. To do this, please click here. Or:
 * Or, submit a request for upload here.

Either way, thanks for contributing to Wikipedia, and if you have any questions don't hesitate to ask. Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 18:00, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Programming
Do you program in any language? Thanks. Netalarm talk 22:17, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * No, not heavily. I know a small amount of VB and HTML, but not allot. Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 06:23, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

SCV
Hi Acather96. Thank you for your work at WP:SCV. It's really appreciated. :) I notice that you often note that you have tagged an article for speedy deletion. I think it's best not to do that since it clutters up the page and makes it difficult to read. Once the link turns red we'll know that it has been deleted anyway. :) Cheers, Theleftorium (talk) 09:27, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, if you notice a close paraphrase, you should most often use Template:copyvio instead of Template:close paraphrasing. Just don't forget to notify the author. Thanks! Theleftorium (talk) 09:32, 23 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Hello,
 * I've been working at SCV for about two months now, and to be honest, nobody seems to have minded before at my SD notes. The only reason I do it is so that people don't waste there time looking at listings that have already been listed. Though I can see your point, it may sometimes look a little cluttered. And, according to your RFA, quite experienced at SCV so I'm not going to argue with you :) Thanks also for the paraphrase advice, I didn't know that. And forgetting to notify the contributor was also a stupid mistake of mine, I'm sorry :) Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 09:49, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmm, I didn't think of that. Makes sense actually. Nevermind me. :) Theleftorium (talk) 09:59, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Abuse Response
Hello, Acather96 and thank you for your response, the only reason I asked that question was exactly what you addressed in you answer, though be it a "valid" revert, I (and this is just me) didn't think it warranted a warning, so thank you your actions, in regards to joining the team the decision is DeltaQuad's and Netlarm's. If asked for my input I will point out the action you took on this matter, and thank you for input, your interest in the team and you contributions to Wikipedia. Cheers Mlpearc   pull my chain   'Tribs  16:26, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Hola
Hey, Acather.

Thanks for the welcome. It is good to be back. :)

--Jaystriker7 (talk) 17:19, 23 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the thanks :) Acather96 (talk) 17:21, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Talk page misrepresentation cleanup
Hi! Thanks for cleaning up that user's mess, appreciated. hope to return the favor someday. Moocha (talk) 19:02, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Dude, i just want to put a few 'alpacas' here and there. Be cool bro, i go to that school, it's alright. comon man, don't be a bringdown —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.176.124.63 (talk) 10:54, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, you were vandalising pages and damaging the encyclopedia, so I felt no need to 'be cool'. Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 11:03, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to the Abuse Response team
✅ Welcome to the English Wikipedia Abuse Response Team. A coordinator has recently closed your nomination and has approved it. There should be a row at Abuse response/Volunteers for you to fill out some basic information about how you can help the team. Please make sure to read the guide to abuse response before starting to deal with a case. If you can, we would like you to join our IRC channel. . Feel free to contact anyone of our coordinators if you have questions.

Coordinators: Jamesofur (T), Netalarm (T), or DeltaQuad (T).

Thank you for your interest in the Abuse Response Team. -- &#47; DeltaQuad &#124; Notify Me  &#92; 19:49, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Abuse Response

 * Welcome to the team. Come and check out the IRC paste this ( #wikipedia-en-abuse  ) into the "Channels:" box it take stright to the room. If you have any problems leave a note on my talk and we'll work it out. Cheers  Mlpearc   powwow  15:35, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * This is a good way to help each other out. Anyway, I was wondering if you would like me to help you through your first case that you just started in regards to 62.253.195.4? -- &#47; DeltaQuad &#124; Notify Me  &#92; 15:38, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * First of all, thank you for your messages :) I can't go on IRC right now, but will ASAP. With regards to my first case, yes, I would be very grateful if you could just check over my edits and make sure that I am handling the case correctly . Also, was it OK to start a case and then investigate it yourself? Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 15:54, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Yep a few people have done that. I will add myself soon enough. -- &#47; DeltaQuad &#124; Notify Me  &#92; 16:17, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Got the IRC message, until you get on please feel free to contact me via my talk if you need anything. Mlpearc   powwow  16:29, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I've approved your mailing list access request. You can look through the mailing list archives if you want to get a better picture of the past discussions that have gone on in abuse response. =D Netalarm talk 10:38, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

shonlock
Hi my name is Deshon and there is incorrect info and pics posted under my stage name shonlock. I changed it but it got changed back. The main pic is not even me..can u help? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shonlock (talk • contribs) 19:56, 29 June 2010 (UTC)


 * What is the 'incorrect info'? Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 19:58, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

BP Talk page refactoring
There was some misunderstanding about the refactoring. I was moving my own comments not another editor's. I wasn't logged in. 69.142.154.10 (talk) 20:20, 29 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Fair enough, you might want to put this is your edit summary in future. Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 19:24, 30 June 2010 (UTC)


 * I didn't realize it would look like I'd moved someone else's comments. I used to be an i.p. only user, then I got an account, and sometimes I switch back and forth between them (not for nefarious purposes, mainly for convencience or because I forgot). I see that I can edit article text that way, but not comment text, since it looks like refactoring someone else's comments. Thanks.69.142.154.10 (talk) 21:23, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

shonlock misprint and wrong
The pic is of the drummer and shonlock is not looking for a label.. He is signed to Arrow-Record/ Universal. Also the music genre is alternative, pop, rock and hip hop. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shonlock (talk • contribs) 20:33, 29 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, the article has now been deleted, so there's not really much I can do now :(. Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 19:28, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Michael Stratton (Scientist)
Hi User:Acather96,

I beleieve that this article has now been cleaned up to remove the issues with copyright. I removed the close paraphrasing tag from the page as I think that the edits by User:Rockpocket deal with it. I hope that is OK. Let me know if you still think the page is problematical. Thanks for your help. Alexbateman (talk) 10:35, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's fine now. Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 15:18, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Diego Jourdan
Hi. I appreciate your continued copyright work. :) I did want to let you know, though, that we don't remove the tag when OTRS is pending; we remove it when OTRS is confirmed. There are many occasions when the OTRS pending tag is added that the permission process does not complete. This one will, I suspect, but there are problems with it that need to be resolved. We can create big issues, though, if we restore the text and the letter doesn't show up: the longer the content is illegally displayed on our website, the more widely mirrored it is likely to be and the more the damages to the copyright owner. :/ --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:28, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for your help, I didn't know about that and will remeber it for the future. Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 18:55, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem. :) As I said, I appreciate your continued copyright work. These are just the kinds of things you learned after doing it for a while. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:59, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Me again, with another tip. Sometimes if you seem to have a false positive it's because content is actually on a subpage. You might look into "About" or "History" tabs on a website. You can also sometimes run a google search for text to see the match: . :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:23, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Saying thanks
This is KWilsonENGL1101 and I am just saying thank you for the warming welcome on to Wikipedia. Also I was wondering if you could you please assist on a article that I am about to start writing on. The article is titled Gambling in Hong Kong, and if you could give me as much input as possibe to make it a great article it would really be appreciated.--141.165.255.57 (talk) 18:32, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, I would be more than happy to give you some advice. First of all the article subject is good, and there are all ready similar articles about gambling indifferent countries. In fact, if you type 'Gambling in' into the search box, you will see what I mean :). So your article doesn't get deleted, I wouldn't go live first, but would instead use a userspace draft.I've created one for you, it can be found here. What I would encourage you to do now is get writing, I am watching the page, so if you ever need a hand, just ask, and I will help out where I can. Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 06:07, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Bedfordshire Barnstar
The reworked barnstar has been alternated. See the barnstar page for more information. If your project agrees, you may wish to invert it (so that the old becomes the alt). --Quinxorin (talk) 18:50, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Heads up
Hi. You need to be a bit more careful when you tag articles at WP:SCV. Vagabond Army Airfield, for example, was not a false positive. Thanks, Theleftorium (talk) 20:41, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cillit Bang EP Album Cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Cillit Bang EP Album Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

✅, now in mainspace.Acather96 (talk) 19:12, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

"No Limit Kids" page deleted for copyright?
Can you help.

Today, we created an article about our upcoming movie NO LIMIT KIDS, and used the Plot description from our movie story webpage. NoLimitKidsMovie.com   The article was flagged, originally - we tried to correct it - but it's now been deleted all together. We own the Plot description from our movie story page, and have sent emails per instructions with no luck.

Any suggestions... We'd like this article active as soon as possible so I'm trying to follow the instructions to correct this, giving permission to donate and/or use our text on the No Limit Page we've created. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lrcee (talk • contribs) 20:27, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Patience is good. Emails are handled by volunteers, so they aren't always received immediately. I have verified the permission and made the appropriate notes on the article, so there should be no remaining copyright issues. Cheers. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:40, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Why you delete my articles?
please don't delete my articles,if you think its bad than just email me at email blanked for privacy —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saudahmed66 (talk • contribs) 07:57, 8 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Hello, what article are you referring to? Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 15:30, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

kartachi cambridge school —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saudahmed66 (talk • contribs) 17:14, 8 July 2010 (UTC) It's not been deleted, it's here! Acather96 (talk) 17:16, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * hey are you on facebook —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saudahmed66 (talk • contribs) 17:38, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Yes, however I do not wish to give out any personal details relating to my account. I hope you can understand this, as I do not even know you, thanks and keep contributing to Wikipedia.Acather96 (talk) 17:44, 8 July 2010 (UTC) you go to my user page there in my information you will find my facebook account and you add me as a friend. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saudahmed66 (talk • contribs) 18:12, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but as I do not know you at all in real life I would prefer not to. Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 18:13, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Re:Thanks
Thanks for the cookie! I appreciate that my actions can come across as a little draconian, but, as I'm sure you can agree, that's the only way to deal with issues like this... J Milburn (talk) 11:35, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

FIR-TEX
Dear Acather96, First of all thank you for your help until now. As expected the article about FIR-TEX has not been approved (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/FIR-TEX) for reasons that the reference material according to the reviewer is not from external parties. I do not understand where he get this from as most of the material in the references is not from us but from external organisations such as Dutch olympic Committee, Dutch Handbal Federation Physiotherapits, an independat athlete, external newspapers... Can i once more ask your help on what to do now. Thank you Flying Dutchman 15:16, 10 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dicky747 (talk • contribs)

Talkback!

 * Thanks Acather96 (talk) 07:48, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Excuse my thickness

 * Thanks Acather96 (talk) 07:48, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Talkback for Lost Stories
Hey there, the Lost Stories page isnt yet another myspace page, i am a new writter to wikipedia and this guys are a bunch of friends, sorry for the loopy and a lil improper page.. but i am still learning codes, and i m learning refrences and stuff, please give me some time before i can finally edit itAcather96 (talk) 07:48, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

PBSKIDS
See reply on users talk page.Acather96 (talk) 07:49, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Argentine Criollo
Hello Acather96. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Argentine Criollo, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''Two sentences is hardly blatant. I will watch list.''' Thank you. Ged UK  07:36, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, fair enough. I guess I was a little over-zealous with the tagging. Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 16:24, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Copyright process
Just so you know, you don't have to list newly blanked pages at WP:CP if they're already listed on one of the WP:SCV daily pages since SCV is already transcluded there. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:47, 13 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I think you have already told me that and I apologise. Acather96 (talk) 18:48, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * No worries, it all comes out in the end. And since I don't think I've told you lately, I really do appreciate the work you do at SCV so I'm not still doing all of it on my own. Cheers! VernoWhitney (talk) 18:51, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the thanks. And what do you think of my new userpage?Acather96 (talk) 20:30, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I like it. It's certainly neater than mine, but mine is also a dumping ground for some links I use often but not often enough to bookmark. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:08, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you
You were so kind to write and so very polite. You are right! I am trying to write my own bio. Should I just give up? I was told it was a good idea by other writers. I thought if I just listed my education and publications as well as the focus of my work that would be neutral enough, ie, not a conflict of interest article. But if so, I will cease and desist. However, I would love help editing articles. IF you have time. The first one is on Anne Bradstreet. The editors have posted a portrait, saying that it is a portrait of Bradstreet. It is not. And, they also have a few erroneous points. Otherwise, it is impressive! Thanks so so much, Chagor62 (talk) 20:56, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thats alright :)Acather96 (talk) 07:10, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Many thanks
Well blow me down! I have been editing on wiki since February 2007, and noone has ever given me a barnstar before! Thank you very much it actually means quite a lot! By the way I have finished the redlinks on List of places in Bedfordshire, there should be an article now for every place in Bedfordshire (bar a few very obscure and possibly obsolete hamlets). Bleaney (talk) 22:47, 17 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Well you completley deserve it :) You've made tons of article's, and have added allot to the project. I am going to 'launch' WP:BEDS when I write the new members guide. The last job I have to do is prioritise articles, (you can also see a useful table in the Assesment subpage (here. If you ever have some free time and wouldn't mind giving me a hand, then that would be fantastic! Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 07:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I have just finished prioritising all the remaining WP:BEDS articles :-) Bleaney (talk) 22:27, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Reviewed the review
Hi, I have reviewed your review per your request on the ER talk page. ;) Derild 49  21  ☼  13:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 07:32, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Fine point of copyright
Hi. :) I continue to note and appreciate your good work in copyright cleanup. I say that because I don't want to give you the wrong impression, since I'm mostly like to drop by when I see something that needs clarification. :D I don't want you to think that I'm only here to criticize!

In this particular case, I've just cleared the article Colorado v. Bannister. Certainly no doubt there's copying there, but in this case we're okay, as U.S. copyright law says that court decisions (in any country) are not copyrighted. See Public domain. This one can be tricky, because not all court documents are covered, but judgments are. And this is particularly the case with the Supreme Court, because it's a federal agency, and works of federal U.S. employees are copyright free in the U.S.

I figured I'd better point this out to you, since you may encounter such situations again in SCV. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:48, 23 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks once again for your invaluable help. As I am in the UK, I was completley unaware of this :) Acather96 (talk) 07:32, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Sonia escolano copyright
Hello. I am the owner of http://www.mynahasgone.com and all its content therefore I think that this article in wikipedia is not a copyright violation.

However, I've written a new article without infringing material, in the following temporary subpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Magina3/Sonia_Escolano/Temp Please, I wish this issue can be cleaning soon. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Magina3 (talk • contribs) 17:32, 23 July 2010 (UTC)


 * If you are the owner of the text, please see WP:DCM which explains how to 'donate' copyrighted materials. Good start on the new article by the way! Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 07:31, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Clfswm
Hello Acather96. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Clfswm, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not an unambiguous copyright infringement, or there is other content to save. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 21:11, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * You're right, the text has changed considerably since I first tagged. Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 07:27, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

George Weinstock and Timothy Ley
Hi Acather96, Regarding the George Weinstock, Timothy Ley and Elaine Mardis articles, this is my own work that I have submitted to Wikipedia. I have emailed the appropriate party to request WP:CONSENT. Please hold off on deleting. Thanks, gremerow --Gremerow (talk) 21:28, 23 July 2010 (UTC)


 * OK, noted. You need to put a short message on the talk page of both articles describing this. They are still going through AFD anyway, but good luck! Elaine Mardis has already been deleted, if you want to try again your best bet would be going to WP:RFUD,which deals with requests for undeletion. Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 07:26, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks - I am still working on George Weinstock but believe I have resolved the issues for the other articles.  For further info please see my talk page.  Thanks, --Gremerow (talk) 22:32, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * All articles should be fixed now. Thanks, --Gremerow (talk) 23:06, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

False positives
Hi. :) I just wanted to remind you that an SCV listing is only a false positive if there is no text duplication at all. If there is duplication, but the text is free for reuse, it's an . That's true even if it's an attributed split. It's important not to label content as "false positives" when duplication does exist as it may on review give a misleading impression of the accuracy of Corensearchbot. You may not have tagged anything with false lately; I'm about a week behind you guys at WP:CP, but I've noticed a few things in the last couple of days, and I just came upon one at Suspected copyright violations/2010-07-16, which I'm working on now. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:45, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Me again. :) Why did you mark, taken from , as "Material PD or appropriately licensed for use."? I'd like to see if I can follow your reasoning there. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:55, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, I'm not sure if you missed this note, but I figured I'd try to draw your attention to it, since you've been actively editing. I'm wondering why you concluded that material was appropriately licensed or PD. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:52, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi, sorry for the late reply. Thanks for the note on false positives? With regards to Angela Myles Beeching, I don't know. Obviously there is no way this could be PD or licensed under the Creative Commons, and I can only apologise. Luckily, it's already been deleted, so there is no problem with that now. Anyway, once again, thanks and sorry :) Acather96 (talk) 06:49, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem; I wasn't looking for an apology. :) I just figured if you were working under a misimpression about copyright status of something there, we probably needed to work it out. There are a lot of rules to juggle in copyright work, I know, as I've been doing this full time for a good two years on Wikipedia now. Mistakes happen, but misunderstandings need sorting. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:32, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Just tucking this in here to avoid inadvertently fanning flames: nice note. :) I like the way you talk to people. Kudos. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:41, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

No I didn't miss it. Thanks, it is appreciated :)Acather96 (talk) 07:12, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Files For Upload
Hello, and thanks for helping us out at Files for upload. I just wanted to let you know that when you accept a request, like you did here, you should always substitute the ffu a template. Otherwise, the section doesn't get automatically archived. Additionally, you should use ffu to indicate that the file has been uploaded, as well as what name it is under, and use ffu talk to notify the requester on his/her user page. This process is explained in detail at the Reviewer instructions. Again, I appreciate that you want to help out at Files for upload, as we need all the reviewers we can get. If you have any questions, please just reply to this message. Thanks, Robert Skyhawk (T C B) 16:38, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I usually work at WP:PAFC and decided to try and help put a bit. I will remeber these points for next time. Thanks :) Acather96 (talk) 06:53, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:32, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

List of professional cyclists who died during a race
Thanks for adding the date parameters to the templates, I missed that.
 * Shearonink (talk) 17:09, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Thats alright, and thanks for the thanks :)Acather96 (talk) 19:22, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 22:32, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

OMG we can't publish CC-BY-SA images
Re: "file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content" RTFA!!!. Ojw (talk) 21:27, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 * With all respect, if you have a problem with one of my onwiki actions, that's fine by me, but please at least talk about it with me coherently and sensibly. Of course we can use CC-BY-SA images, as long as they're tagged correctly. With the source, you need to state it clearly (along with the tags). I assume that you're talking about this. I removed the non free screenshot tag, because it does state that it does not include media found on a webpage. I described this clearly in my edit summary. So at the moment, there is no clear information about the file's copyright licensce or a clear source, so this is why it is up for deletion. Also, if you are telling me to 'Read the F****** Archives', I assume you mean the  file history, which doesnt explicitly state who made it or the source. If I am missing something, please tell me.Thanks,Acather96 (talk) 06:07, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * My guess is that they source is Geograph Britain and Ireland, but that still doesn't answer the copyright issue, and the site's terms seem to indicate it's copyrighted and not freely licensed, so it could probably be tagged with a generic Non-free fair use in. That said, however, It may not pass WP:NFCC since it's not discussed outside of the short caption, and there's already the other screenshot directly above it in the article to demonstrate what the map looks like. Since it's still early for me I would take that to WP:NFCR if you want more (coherent) feedback on that point. VernoWhitney (talk) 11:58, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 23:57, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

RFPP Clerkship Discussion
I was startled to see an Endorse Protection Template at RFPP. I've been working on a proposal that is very much related, so I was initially chagrined to find that the function was already in place. Then I checked the talk page, and see that this is a very recent creation.

I mentioned your addition in my very, very draft proposal here. In fact, you are the first person I've notified.

You obviously have interest and knowledge of RFPP, so I hope you will contribute your thoughts.-- SPhilbrick  T  00:45, 14 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi Sphilbrick, and first of all thank you for letting me know about your proposal. I think it would be a good idea to have RFPP clerks, as the noticeboard is freqently backlogged, and it would be helpful for patrolling admins to have the clerks to review cases. I will add my ideas and thoughts to the talkpage shortly, and thanks again for informing me of this proposal. Acather96 (talk) 13:51, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I just added a section with you in mind (thinking is it is a good idea, you might be able to make such a template easily.)-- SPhilbrick  T  15:13, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I've created a template, which can be found here Acather96 (talk) 17:03, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * My first reaction - looks great. (Same with my second reaction). Will look at it in more detail, and come back with more thoughts.--  SPhilbrick  T  20:28, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm out of town for a few days, will discuss more when I return.-- SPhilbrick  T  00:45, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Microformats
You recently !voted on Requests for comment/Microformats. This is a courtesy note to let you now that I have now posted, as promised, my view there, and to ask you revisit the debate. Andy Mabbett (User: Pigsonthewing ); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 15:05, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 August 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 07:37, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Fir Tex
An article that you have been involved in editing, Fir Tex, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  Velella  Velella Talk 11:32, 18 August 2010 (UTC)


 * In response to your message which pretty well coincided with one of my edits to Fir Tex, I regret that the edits don't change my opinion.  It is a product hyped by its manufacturer as something special with technological innovations. None of these claims have been substantiated. No patents are alluded to. The processes claimed  have no known provenance in science. Their own references from their own web-site would be laughable if they weren't meant to be serious. I suspect that it is a fairly ordinary fabric with a reflective layer that keeps in warmth. Well, there are probably hundreds of such fabrics around - have a look in an quality mountaineering clothing shop. I don't believe this article has notability, its claims have no scientific backing and they can't be verified, worse the manufacturers allude to scientific backing when none exists. If it is neither notable and cannot be verified than I guess it must be just an advertisment This smells badly of snake-oil and it would need the manufacturers to come up with some proper scientific evaluation or some credible statements before I would change my mind. Sorry.  Velella  Velella Talk  20:56, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Doc Quintana (talk) 05:15, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:18, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Regarding File:LION Books.jpg
hi there, I just updated the descriptin section to avoid deletion. Could you please verity?? thanks :) --Mayooresan (talk) 17:51, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅, thanks for contributing to Wikipedia :)Acather96 (talk) 17:53, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you :) --Mayooresan (talk) 23:11, 20 August 2010 (UTC)