User talk:Acbandini

Replaceable fair use File:Frank Spotnitz headshot.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Frank Spotnitz headshot.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:46, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Frank Spotnitz headshot.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Frank Spotnitz headshot.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:38, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, Acbandini. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)


 * I'm concerned about both the tone of your edits over the long term, and the possibility that they include copyright violations. I've asked for input from other objective editors. Thanks, 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:58, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Your addition to Frank Spotnitz has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Garchy (talk) 16:23, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Apologies - I didn't realise I was violating any guidelines. I edited the Frank Spotnitz Wikipedia page today, as I'm Frank Spotnitz! I was simply updating my biography and adding credits for my latest show, RANSOM. Now I see that all of my credits have disappeared! Please could you reinstate them? Thank you, Acbandini Acbandini (talk) 17:28, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Dear Acbandini, you obviously have a conflict of interest, which means it is a really bad idea to edit the page yourself. It is also a really bad idea to copy content from somewhere and stick it in here--it's a bad idea in TV and film, and it's a bad idea here, as well as against the law. So you will see that the edit history has been cleaned up: I had to remove many of your edits from the history. As for the "credits", if you go and reinsert those, you have to do those in a way that jives with our guidelines. If you don't know what those are, it's a good idea to learn them. Wikipedia is not a resume service, and it is not our job, though it may be our desire, to represent your work. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 01:08, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello - apologies again for this unintended COI. I'm afraid I'm still confused. Who should edit the page? My assistant has historically done it, since she best knows my work and therefore will ensure the page's accuracy. The only info that was copied was from my company's website, so the copyright is owned by me. The only things I copied from Wikipedia were links from other pages. I also followed Wikipedia's guidelines for my table of credits, which were very neatly formatted. I don't expect my Wikipedia page to be a resume - I have IMDb for that (and, indeed, you can cross-reference and confirm my credit listing there, for accuracy). Surely it's better for me - and better for Wikipedia - if my page is as comprehensive, accurate and user-friendly as possible? It's my belief that the updated page was. Am I not allowed to add anything else to the page now? My fear is also that another user may add false information to it and I don't wish to be misrepresented. Thanks again for your time and consideration.

Speedy deletion nomination of Big Light Productions


A tag has been placed on Big Light Productions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.biglight.com/about-us. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 05:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Big Light Productions Ltd logo.png


The file File:Big Light Productions Ltd logo.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Uploaded for Big Light Productions. No other use."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 13:53, 9 April 2022 (UTC)