User talk:Accidentalsouthernbelle

October 2014
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kate Mulgrew, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 20:48, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Kate Mulgrew. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Neil N  talk to me 16:53, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Please help me. I work with Kate Mulgrew and she tells me that that section relating to abortion is untrue. She is neither a supporter of or a detractor of abortion. She REALLY wants that removed from her page. How do I go about making that happen?

Also, Tim Hagan's page states that he is divorced from Kate. Can I use that as a source?

Accidentalsouthernbelle (talk) 18:31, 20 October 2014 (UTC)Accidental Southern Belle
 * This has the direct quote, "Abortion does not compute with my philosophy." If she wants to clarify her views, she needs to get them published somewhere. --Neil N  talk to me 18:38, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia articles cannot be used as sources for other articles. The sentence in the Hagen article is also unsourced. Do you have a published source covering the divorce? --Neil N  talk to me 18:43, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Accidentalsouthernbelle. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Amy Cuddy, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Keri (talk) 16:39, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Accidentalsouthernbelle. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Kate Mulgrew, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Keri (talk) 16:39, 2 July 2015 (UTC)