User talk:AccountHistory

September 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sisters in Crime, you may be blocked from editing. Bbb23 (talk) 15:40, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

I am disturbed by your threatening tone. My edits to the page were additions that update the organizations publicly stated mission etc. The addition of a complete list of past presidents merely expanded beyond the one random past president. The addition of two awards completed the list of awards previously listed. The edits were done to keep the Wikipedia page current and in no way are self promotional. They are informational and accurate. Please advise why you believe otherwise when the goal is for current accurate information to be included on Wikipedia. User talk:AccountHistory
 * Everything that is added to Wikipedia articles must be reliably sourced, encyclopedic, and sufficiently noteworthy to justify inclusion. Unfortunately, your additions are none of the above. The number of members is not sourced properly. The organization's "core values" are not noteworthy to anyone except the organization itself, and are largely duplicative of its mission statement, which, frankly, shouldn't be in the article either. The organization's website cannot be used as a source because it is self-serving. Wikipedia relies on secondary sources to make things potentially noteworthy. I have no idea what your relationship is to the organization, but it appears that you have a conflict of interest. Therefore, you should not be editing the article. If you wish to propose that material be added (or changed), you must use the article Talk page to propose those changes. If you persist in editing the article, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:26, 21 September 2021 (UTC)