User talk:AccountInCompliance

Got something to say? The door is open. AccountInCompliance (talk) 19:12, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks to 109.108.251.119
Thanks for pulling that template. It was inappropriate but I did not want to act unilaterally. This evidences and puts into the record that my account is not 109.108.251.119 so when the predictable trolls descend on the respective article please take notice that you are advised to that effect. AccountInCompliance (talk) 20:13, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

OK Misunderstanding cleared up.

 * A different user referred to as a sock puppet. It looked like I was being confused. Moving this to here in the interest of transparency. Thank you for your clarification.

You have a beautiful user page please however tolerate us lesser mortals.
+	 	+	I am a simple human editor who does not have an expensive smart phone and background in fancy wiki software. You have made a very bitey remark regarding my account and I am appealling to you as someone who is clearly intelligent enough to recognize that you may have been a bit too swift to condemn a good faith user. I am posting from a public terminal which just opened and has some highly constrictive rules of use. My activity is subject to invasive regulations and constraints including possible capture of my password. +	 	+	Primarily as a result of these constraints, I can't use my existing WP account from here. There is a further complication in that I cannot from here access my email for a password reset. There is also a right of WP users to use more than one account if there is a risk that their personal or professional life might be compromised if their right to privacy or anonymous publishing on WP were compromised. +	 	+	For these reasons I needed to open this new account to use this terminal. There has not been any form of puppetry whatsoever to the contrary respectable and respected edits. +	 	+	You seemed to be working very fast and interjected yourself into the talk page of the Armenian Genocide page where I concurred with Andy the Grump, a five year user who consistently has opposed attempts to shift that page from an NPOV WP-compliant to a POV. How is that "socking"? +	 	+	Your accusation is as you would know "bitey". Please do not continue in that vein. I would appreciate it. Your frank interest in fencing and sparring suggests that you may enjoy conflict however warring is contrary to the spirit of collaboration. I am not here to edit war. I gave Andy the Grump a barnstar even though he is very abrasive because of his working in protecting the page Armenian Genocide. He is retiring so someone will have to protect that page. +	 	+	I trust that if you look at this more closely you will understand that just because this account is new that does not make it "socking" and I would appreciate if you would be cool about this and not go into the defensive and combative mode that some users seem to enjoy. You have done such a nice job on your page that it shoudl go without saying that you don't need to deliberately harass other users with spurious allegations. I assume this was a simple error on your part becuase you try to work quickly. Please advise. +	 	+	If you have any doubt, please note also that my edit at the GMO page was promptly approved. That evidences that I am already establishing a good repuation for this account so please join in the spirit of collaboration with a kind word, or step back, thanks. AccountInCompliance (talk) AccountInCompliance (talk) 22:02, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration temporary injunction for the Genetically modified organisms arbitration case
''You are receiving this message because you are on the notification list for this case. You may opt-out at any time The Arbitration Committee has enacted the following temporary injunction, to expire at the closure of the Genetically modified organisms'' arbitration case: For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply ) (via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:59, 6 October 2015 (UTC))
 * 1) Standard discretionary sanctions are authorised for all pages relating to to genetically modified organisms and agricultural biotechnology, including glyphosate, broadly interpreted, for as long as this arbitration case remains open. Any uninvolved administrator may levy restrictions as an arbitration enforcement action on users editing in this topic area, after an initial warning.
 * 2) Editors are prohibited from making more than one revert per page per day within the topic area found in part 1 of this injunction, subject to the usual exemptions.
 * Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard

Genetically modified organisms arbitration proposed decision posted
Hi AccountInCompliance. A proposed decision has been posted for the Genetically modified organisms arbitration case, for which you are on the notification list. Comments about the proposed decision are welcome at the proposed decision talk page. Thank you. For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply ) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 12 November 2015 (UTC)