User talk:Accountness888

Speedy deletion nomination of Zhang Lijun(entrepreneur)


A tag has been placed on Zhang Lijun(entrepreneur), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion,. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 20:39, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Pillowfluffyhead (talk) 21:31, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Zhang Lijun(entrepreneur)
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags until an admin has reviewed them. You keep mentioning that promotion is the reason for speedy deletion. However, the main reason is that there has been a discussion before about this article and it has been agreed that the referneces provided (which are the same as last time) are insufficient to establish notability. Any questions, please feel free to reach out. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 21:33, 6 September 2017 (UTC)