User talk:Accurastic

Nomination of Hillcrest Labs for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hillcrest Labs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hillcrest Labs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tinton5 (talk) 07:27, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Seven Years of Highly Defective People


The article Seven Years of Highly Defective People has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This book is not notable enough for Wikipedia. Google newspapers search and Google Scholar each find a few passing mentions, but nothing more. The article itself is essentially unsourced (the NYT article is yet another passing mention)."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 28 March 2023 (UTC)