User talk:Acd1223/sandbox

Article Evaluation
The first thing I noticed about this article is that it is lengthy. If I wasn't a student in communication studies I might have a hard time navigating through the topics within the article to reach the information I was looking for. The content is relevant to the overarching topic, however, I would aim to condense some of the information to make the article easier to navigate for the general public.

That said, the article was written from the scholarly point of view and the information contained within the article did seem neutral, and well researched. I believe that the topic of interpersonal communication was covered and explained to the general public in totality. I do not believe anything could have been added, I do believe that the article could have been condensed, or a few of the paragraphs could have been paraphrased and linked out to sub-pages on specific realms of human communication theory in Wikipedia.

As I checked the references in the article it does appear the article is well-cited and appropriately attributed to original sources.

This article specifically took a more neutral or unbiased stance towards interpersonal communication than the articles and books I have read on the topic for courses in relational communication and human communication theory.

The talk page let me know that this article was originally a part of an educational project and is now part of three separate Wikiprojects in multiple fields of study. I also noticed there were similar suggestions on the talk page on how to better organize this page for the reader.