User talk:AceYYC/Archive5

Your GA nomination of Alberta Highway 4
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Alberta Highway 4 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rschen7754 -- Rschen7754 (talk) 21:20, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alberta Highway 4
The article Alberta Highway 4 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Alberta Highway 4 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rschen7754 -- Rschen7754 (talk) 22:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sherwood Park Freeway
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sherwood Park Freeway you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Canadian Paul -- Canadian Paul (talk) 14:01, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sherwood Park Freeway
The article Sherwood Park Freeway you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sherwood Park Freeway for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Canadian Paul -- Canadian Paul (talk) 23:40, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alberta Highway 4
The article Alberta Highway 4 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Alberta Highway 4 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rschen7754 -- Rschen7754 (talk) 03:41, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sherwood Park Freeway
The article Sherwood Park Freeway you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sherwood Park Freeway for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Canadian Paul -- Canadian Paul (talk) 03:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Grande Prairie spelling
Hi Acefitt,

Your maps for Alberta Highway 2 and Alberta Highway 43 look really good; however, I noticed that Grande Prairie was spelt "Grand Prairie". Is it possible for you to correct this? Thanks! Happy Holidays/Merry Christmas. -- MuzikMachine (talk) 22:42, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Dammit. Yeah it's an easy fix, I'll do it. -- Acefitt 00:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WestJet logo small.png
 Thanks for uploading File:WestJet logo small.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Deerfoot Trail
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Deerfoot Trail you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bob1960evens -- Bob1960evens (talk) 11:40, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Anthony Henday Drive
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Anthony Henday Drive you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bob1960evens -- Bob1960evens (talk) 11:01, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Deerfoot Trail
The article Deerfoot Trail you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Deerfoot Trail for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bob1960evens -- Bob1960evens (talk) 09:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Anthony Henday Drive
The article Anthony Henday Drive you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Anthony Henday Drive for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bob1960evens -- Bob1960evens (talk) 08:02, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

July 2017
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Edmonton tornado has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Meters (talk) 22:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes that section was badly messed up. You could have fixed it, you could have gone through the history to see if there was an earlier version that was acceptable, you could have tagged it, you could have moved it to the talk page for a rewrite, you could have linked to the problem section on the talk page, you could even have removed it with an edit summary explaining. Any of those approaches woulds have been better than hiding the section in a comment and not mentioning it in your edit summary . Meters (talk) 22:29, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah I meant to fix that section written by a 2-year-old but completely forgot. Of course, I always appreciate being told what an edit summary is after using them consistently for 10 years. -- Acefitt 07:48, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
 * So why didn't you? Your sarcasm is misplaced. I didn't tell you what an edit summary was, and it's irrelevant whether you normally use them. You didn't that time. It's a bad idea to comment out a section, but to do so without even mentioning it in the summary or talk page is not acceptable. Please don't do it again. Meters (talk) 20:32, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Why didn't I? Cause I completely forgot, like I said? Again, I'll be sure all my further havoc is wrought upon articles that interest you. Better still, you should probably check my contribs and revert all the unacceptable things I've done thus far. It's pretty far back to go! -- Acefitt 07:32, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Swoop WestJet logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Swoop WestJet logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Daylen (talk) 01:25, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge submissions
The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada will soon be reaching its first-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and no unsourced claims.

You may submit articles using this link for convenience. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 18:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewing
I notice that you have the "administrator someday" userbox. Reviewing new pages is one of the best ways to develop experience needed to successfully wield the mop. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  09:31, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Request for Participation at WT: Airports
As you may be aware, there was a recent discussion on the talk page of WP:Airports which prematurely and without consensus resulted in mass changes to airport articles throughout Wikipedia. Before a drastic change like this is put into practice, it is important to have clear consensus, which from my readings as an observer, did not occur. Many of these changes started to occur before any real discussion had taken place, and despite much disagreement from some community members. Disagreement is good -- it's great actually -- without it nothing would ever get done. But it's important that everyone opinions are heard fairly and accurately, and that significant changes like merging the Regional Airline destinations with the Mainline destinations are not done without such consensus. I encourage you, as someone involved in WP:Airports and the original discussion, to voice your opinions and discuss with others about how we should move forward at this point. Positive and constructive conversation is the way to a consensus. I also ask that everyone (myself included) ceases merging or un-merging mainline/regional destinations until a censuses is reached. Please contribute to the conversation here. T ofutwitch11  (T ALK ) 00:42, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Welcome mural at LCI entrance.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Welcome mural at LCI entrance.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:32, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:USA states population map 2006 color.png


The file File:USA states population map 2006 color.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned map."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob 13 Talk 17:31, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Hyphen
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/WestJet_Encore/archive1

Thank you for your comment. There, I reply, mentioning why I used the hyphen. I am open to change, whatever is correct. Vanguard10 (talk) 03:05, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Question
Hi there, you reverted my edit to WestJet. I understand the changes to Swoop and WJ Encore, but is there a reason WJ Link isn't included in this article? It's as much a subsidiary as the others and the section I added was fully sourced. Madg2011 (talk) 21:08, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Because when part of the addition is blatantly wrong it's easier for me to just revert then re-add anything useful after, which is what I've done. -- Acefitt 21:13, 21 March 2018 (UTC)