User talk:Ace ventura

Hello
Hello Ace Ventura, I notice that you continue to edit the Gary Goodyear and Janko Peric. It is great to see you have such enthusiasm for these two individuals. As they both have done an around average service for the people of Cambridge. Hope to see you around, and happy Wikipedian!!! Pete Peters 00:08, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

3RR Rule
Hello Ace Ventura, please note that you are nearing the violation of the WP:3RR. Please do not edit the Gary Goodyear page in the next 24 hours, unless you have something enyclopedic to add.Pete Peters 02:08, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Great To See You a New Wikipedian
Great to have you aboard, and hope you have a fun journey here at Wikipedia. You seem to be a Conservative supporter, so I made this for you!!!

If You Would Like to Expand Your User Page
You'll enjoy this, it is an array of userboxes for your user page Cheers.Pete Peters 20:45, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Gary Goodyear
The page looks up to snuff now. Please sign every comment on user talk pages with four tildas (~). I see some dick decided to takeaway your conservative logo. Pete Peters 01:37, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Using Templates
Please note that the userboxes you are using come from templates. You are going to the template page, and cutting and pasting the code and adding it to your user page. This makes for a rather confusing operation. A template has the address http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:..., these templates can be called by using using the rest of the address after Template: and placing brackets 2 forward brackets before the address, and two end brackets after the adrdess around them. Exmaple, give you this image. It makes for much better coding. When I sent you the conservative userbox, no template was created for that particular version. So I sent you the code.

I am not to sure if you have a hate on for Janko Peric, Although putting in the fact he lost by 6,000 votes may be just. I don't see the purpose of dominating his entry with his electoral failure. Especially given the possibility that he is not likeable by voters, he is the best thing that happened to the Conservative supporters in that riding. So making entries made to make Janko Peric look bad, might not be in the your best interest. I think you would be better served if he tried to run again, much like Brian Mulroney making sure that John Turner ran in 1988.

I am not too sure if the Gary Goodyear SubCommittee stuff is really that notable. The Committee sure, the Sub Committee I do not see the purpose. A sub committee is a dime a dozen, and unless something notable comes out of a particular sub-committee, I don't see the purpose stating it.Pete Peters 13:39, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

There is no evidence
About the ballot stuffing. I have examined the results from 2004 and 2006 elections, and there was no ballot stuffing from what I can see. You may have heard that rumour working at a local campaign. Those rumours always fly around local campaigns. I heard a rumour that Trinity-Spadina had 1000 dead people vote in 1993, but that rumour cam from an Elections Canada official. Since 1000 less votes would have not prevented Ianno from defeat, the issue wasn't investigated is super duper way. If there was any large scale voter fraud, it would have been from dead people. But I don't think it really happened. My horror story in the 2006 campaign was when the two sign crews cars got broken into at their homes within a 48 hours period. Also the 2 main sign crew helpers, who did not have vehicles, one had his front door locks vandalized with screw, and the other had their backyard gate broken. I know it can be frustrating, the Liberal party culture is riddled by this behaviour. But the proof of voter fraud requires a conspiracy by many people, something that I don't think did happen. Someone by now would have spilled the beans. Pete Peters 20:25, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Telegdi
The Globe and Mail link you've provided leads to a Conservative Party press release. This isn't sufficient proof that the incident was of significance to the national campaign.

This is a content dispute, and the 3RR very much applies. I'm going to request that you self-revert your last edit; if you do not, you will be at risk of being blockd. I apologize -- I didn't realize you hadn't actually reverted the page. At present, neither of us is in violation of the 3RR.

I should clarify that that I not trying to "whitewash" the situation; I simply believe that we should make certain that any reference to this incident is up to the level of proper encyclopedic standards. As it stands, I'm not convinced this (mostly artificial) scandal merits mention at all. (However, we can discuss this in more detail tomorrow.) CJCurrie 01:56, 2 August 2006 (UTC)


 * CJCurrie is the Wikipedia Canadian Politics Czar. Please do not argue with him. :) Pete Peters 02:01, 2 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Not arguin just wondering why my entry although controversial i have provide links proving it when other aseretions on Telegid's page have no links proving it and are allowed. not trying to start trouble :)--Ace ventura 02:06, 2 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I wouldn't use a Warren Kinsella blog to add proof to the allegation. One was a press release by the tories, the other was a Blog by a person who personally despises Telegdi. I am wondering if you worked on a campaign that had a lot of gossiping going on. :)  Because it is easy at first to buy into it. Pete Peters 02:12, 2 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I added the one that hated Telegdi cause it has the exact article where the quote came from, so i thought yes it is a blog and not that u can;t count on what is said but the exact article is there so i thought that would be okay. I know it is no secret that i hate the current liberals but i thought by provinf links i was covering my ass espically since there is no other links throughout the whole article.--Ace ventura 02:26, 2 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Also i have never worked on a campaign before, may have blogged on political sites in Goodyear's favour but thats it--Ace ventura 05:34, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

At this point, I'm inclined to agree that the Telegdi reference should be included -- but we should be careful with the language, and we shouldn't imply that it was a national controversy. (We might also want to clarify that AT was in his early 20s when he made the statement.) CJCurrie 01:38, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:146_mandura.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:146_mandura.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:18, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

mandur
why did u delete the picture of Ajmer Mandur from his wiki site? Your bot deleted him. he is a Canadian politician and the image u deleted is used all acorss the internet as his headshot. Please do not delete any more politicans headshots thanks.Ace ventura 21:58, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The bot removed it because there is no information on where the image is from, and no evidence that the claim of GFDL is correct. --Carnildo 03:26, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:118WP.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:118WP.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:28, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:DONJUAN.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DONJUAN.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:03, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:118WP_interior.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:118WP_interior.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:06, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Gary.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gary.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:11, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:118WP_interior2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:118WP_interior2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:56, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:CCSSLOGO2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CCSSLOGO2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:14, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:David_Pelly.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:David_Pelly.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:03, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright
Hello Ace ventura. Your response to Carnildo on Image:118WP.jpg shows that you do understand how we deal with images on Wikipedia. We are very careful and only allow images to be used if we have concrete information about their copyright holder and copyright status. You have tagged almost every image that you have uploaded as being licensed under the GFDL. Please understand that this is a very specific license that is not in wide use, and it is highly unlikely that it is used by all of the different sources that you have taken images from. If you are to make this calim, you must name the image's copyright holder and state the reasons that you beleive they have released the image under that license. www.metacafe.com, which you list on many of your uploads is not the copyright holder of those images, even if they host them, and says nothing about the GFDL. Likewise, www.garygoodyear.ca says nothing about this license for Image:Headshotgg.jpg. Please go through all of your uploads and either clarify or correct their copyright status. If you need any help, please do not hesitate to ask at Media copyright questions. ×Meegs 09:52, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:3778 b.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:3778 b.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 14:01, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:118WP.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:118WP.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ×Meegs 23:32, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Image:Img 118WP center 005.jpg, Image:Img 118WP new 002-2.jpg, Image:Chage118.jpg, and Image:Img 118WP new 001.jpg are also listed. ×Meegs 23:32, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Nomination of Royal College of Chiropractic Sports Sciences for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Royal College of Chiropractic Sports Sciences is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Royal College of Chiropractic Sports Sciences until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Delta13C (talk) 23:34, 13 January 2016 (UTC)