User talk:Ace woe

Welcome Ace woe! Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are registered editors!

Hello Ace woe. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Thuresson, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type  here on your talk page and someone will try to help. To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Mypage/sandbox&action=edit&preload=Template:User_Sandbox/preload create your own personal sandbox] for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put  on your userpage.

Please remember to: The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes  at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
 * Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.

 Sincerely, Thuresson (talk) 00:04, 12 July 2019 (UTC)   [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thuresson&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Español

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

עברית

Русский

日本語

Polski

فارسی

Hello, Ace woe. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Thuresson (talk) 00:04, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Re: Your email
A couple days ago I associated Draft:Darnell Price with some relevant WikiProjects. As a side-effect, that created a talk page for the draft, which may be what you're thinking of. Being connected to WikiProjects may help interested reviewers find the draft, but has no explicit effect on the review process. The draft has been in the pool to be reviewed for two months. The current backlog is five months, so you do the math. When it is reviewed you will receive a notice on this page. If it is declined (which happens to 80% of drafts) a copy of the notice will also be placed on the draft. If it is accepted, the draft will be moved to article space.

As far as next steps, Thuresson left you a notice a couple months ago about managing a conflict of interest. You clearly have one, but have taken no steps to disclose it or address it. It is essential that you do so, otherwise the draft could be deleted, the topic could be salted (to prevent anyone else from writing about it), and you could be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Worldbruce (talk) 21:16, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Wow, that's strange, I was never notified about this. In fact, there's nothing in my gmail inbox from that user, but I appreciate you pointing it out. Honestly, I am not used to the way this site operates and I haven't been actively signed in since I moved recently and have been focused on other projects.

If by "conflict of interest" you mean that I know OG Cuicide, yeah, I do; but he isn't paying me to create the page, if that's what you're implying. I wish he was. He merely told me that it would be a wise move to familiarize myself with Wikipedia formatting standards because he knows people who ARE interested in having their pages built - people who are legends in the hip-hop industry, and especially in South Central Los Angeles (I'm perfectly willing to disclose any sort of agreements in this regard, should they arise).

Nonetheless, I appreciate this information, but I sure do wish that this process was less complicated. Darnell Price is certainly worthy of having a published Wikipedia page; the notion that the topic would be "salted" seems unacceptable, especially considering the nature of his work in the field of suicide prevention. He just got done doing a series of talks with KRS-One; his album features the likes of Paul Wall, Kurupt, A.D., and other big name rappers, all verified artists on Instagram and Twitter, etc. (just like Mr. Price himself) so it certainly seems weird to me that this approach would be taken simply because I've made his acquaintance. But, again, I am new to this community.

If you have any additional information I would greatly appreciate receiving it.

Thanks again,

-Aaron

Ace woe (talk) 22:22, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Declare any connection
Hello Ace woe. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Draft:Darnell Price, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ace woe. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Worldbruce (talk) 21:17, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

_______

Please forgive the delayed response here, I am new to the Wikipedia community and for some reason never received a notification about this message.

I have NO financial stake in the creation of this page. The launching of this draft has merely been a way for me to familiarize myself with Wikipedia's formatting standards. I am a regular contributor over at "Genius.com" and being able to edit material on both platforms would be extremely helpful.

Please let me know if this message is adequate. I am unfamiliar with the various processes related to the creation of Wikipedia pages, but I hope to learn more.

Regards,

-AW

Ace woe (talk) 22:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

_______

Am I responding to this message correctly? I haven't received a response and I'm a bit confused by the messaging function on this site, to be honest.

I might send a separate message again just to be safe...

Ace woe (talk) 19:40, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Darnell Price has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Darnell Price. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 18:33, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Darnell Price has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Darnell Price. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:41, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Darnell Price (November 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Darnell Price and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Darnell Price, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Darnell_Price Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Primefac&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Darnell_Price reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 22:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Darnell Price concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Darnell Price, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Darnell Price


Hello, Ace woe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Darnell Price".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:13, 20 May 2020 (UTC)