User talk:Acegikmo1

For old talk see /2004, /2005

I Bet You Look Good On the Dancefloor
Please see my reply to your post on Talk:I Bet You Look Good On the Dancefloor.

Twelve Monkeys
FYI, I have replied to your query about Tweleve Monkeys on my Talk: page. (The short answer is "yes".) – B.Bryant 02:32, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Re: Fix You
Hi,

You removed the link to the radio station WAVF from the Fix You page, saying tha that it was a minor station. However, WAVF was the sixth largest (of 24) radio station in Charlestown, a city with a metropolitan area populated by over half a million people, as of summer 2005. Why is it a minor station?

Cheers,

Acegikmo1 22:56, 16 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi,


 * You've pretty much answered your own question! Sixth largest in a city with a metropolitan area population of only half a million?  I'm presuming that you are from Charlestown, but the fact that the vast majority of people outside the USA have never heard of the place (myself and my entire family included) do not enable it to compare favourably with world-renouned cities like Boston, Seattle, Atlanta and San Diego.  But these are minor issues - the major one is that the radio cited did not have its own Wiki article.  There is no real reason to cite any radio station in the paragraph - all of the stations mentioned are minor (in terms of audience) compared to BBC Radio 1 or Virgin Radio, but neither are mentioned.   I could go on... but I'm sure you get the jist.


 * Cheers, DJR (Talk) 23:12, 16 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your reply - I understand where you are coming from about the US Modern Rock system. However, I really don't think it is necessary to include a station that does not have its own article on Wikipedia.  I must say I do not really understand American radio very well (all your stations seem to only have four letters names for some reason!), but I am sure that there must be (an) alternative(s) who have a Wikipedia article to link to.  While giving a broad picture of American airplay is important, in the grand scheme of things individual stations are not, and should really be kept to a minimum of relevancy and those with articles (the latter purely because it acts as a guage of the station's relevancy).  I hope this makes sense... an alternative solution would be to simply list cities rather than stations.
 * Cheers, DJR (Talk) 10:43, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

IP vandalism
I've temporarily semi-protected the article, they should lose interst in a couple of days. Just zis Guy you know? 23:38, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Re: "Master and Servant"
Hi there,

I was going off the information provided on the official site's page on the single for the #6 peak. The site's you provided, however, do seem to have much more extensive databases, and as such, would obviously be much more reliable, so I'll get around to fixing the various pages that mention the #6 position to #9. Thanks for clearing that up. John5008 | talk to me 01:32, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject US regions election
The page hosting the May 2006 election of WikiProject US regions is up now. You may now sign up as a candidate for coordinator or add new proposals concenring the workings and policies of the WikiProject. Voting begins on the 6th. -JCarriker 18:44, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * This note is to remind you to please vote in the May 2006 election. There is a proposal for the the partial shading of states in the maps series and the annual election of a coordinator. Please vote by the May 12th. Thanks. -JCarriker 18:26, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

A belated reply
Will I am inclined to give the programed reply that&mdash;in regards to health&mdash;that I am fine, the truth is that my health has been deciling for the better part of this and I am in fact withdrawing from a summer course in the hopes that my health will improve for the fall term. I appreciate that you voted in the Wikiproject election and I will count your vote. However, I find the commitement to the project of the participants other than Jmabel and yourself disappointing. They never reply when notified about changes to the project and I feel that I will either have to find more active participants, or turn its responsibilites over to another project, or alas close the page.

I see that you are no longer a teenager, that makes me feel old for some reason, inspite of being only a year your elder. I hope that you are progressing well in your studies, and that your diversions and hobbies are as well. Still have that Queen site per chance? I must say I am impressed with the areas of study that you have settled on, few intellects can balance Science and History, becoming quite the junzǐ I see.

Until we cross paths again, JCarriker [04:25, 30 May 2006 (UTC)]

Thanks a lot
You know NO ONE is going to improve that stupid reactions page. It's just going to sit there as it is. Why can't you just let it be merged into the Japanese war crimes page where it belongs? John Smith&#39;s 21:56, 23 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Well I would say there was a consensus before your comment. As I have said so many times, no one wanted to deal with this article for months. So you will have to. Once the thing is closed I'll rename the page. John Smith&#39;s 22:04, 23 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Hey, the page was re-directed to war crimes in the end, so there's no problem. John Smith&#39;s 21:36, 27 August 2006 (UTC)


 * dummy edit*

Episode article naming
Hiya, we're currently discussing the issue of naming episode articles, over at Wikipedia_talk:Naming conventions (television). I saw that you'd been involved in a similar discussion about the Star Trek articles, so since the results of our discussion will quite probably directly impact the Star Trek articles, I wanted to make sure you were invited. :) --Elonka 00:28, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

nitrium
I was going to try to write more but other articles seem more interesting. Although I don't claim ownership of the article, I'm essentially the only one who has written about it. What is your opinion if I put it into a disambiguation page and that those pages are redirected to sodium and potash articles? VK35 20:57, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use disputed for Image:Cube.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cube.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:27, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Marshall, Texas FAR
Marshall, Texas has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Okiefromokla•talk 17:42, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

In Remembrance...
--nat Alo! Salut! Sunt eu, un haiduc?!?! 00:12, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Regarding Polling Graphs
i agree that the trend lines do not show the information very well because of newly entered canidacy as occured with Fred Thompson, however i think it is important for voters to see the trends. I created the past 6 months graphs in order to remedy this and only focus on the more recent trends. I think that for the graphs of the entire polling graph, it makes sense to have a moving average, but for the past 6 months polling, it makes sense to have a trend line. Please post your thoughts back on my page Perpetualization (talk) 01:51, 22 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Contrary to what i said before, i no longer think moving averages are a good idea. I uploaded a moving average version of Iowa-all-polls, you should be able to see it through the image history.  I believe it portrays the data very poorly because instead of showing overall trends, it is showing variation in polls, making it appear as if canidates jump and fall when in reality, these jumps are within the margin of error of the polls.  Additionally, apart from Romney, the lines appear as a mess as they mix together and are very hard to see any useful data from.  If you disagree, or would like to continue this discussion, post it on the talk page Talk:Opinion polling for the Republican Party (United States) presidential primaries, 2008 so that other editors can give their opinions. Thank you for your input, Perpetualization (talk) 19:13, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Farscape
Thanks for all your work on the Crackers Don't Matter page!QuizzicalBee (talk) 17:55, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Good job. As an editorial choice, you could consider transwikiing the quote section to wikiquote and then add to the external links section in the wikipedia article (see Quotations for more). That also makes the article look more professional. – sgeureka t•c 13:48, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Rygelforcedtoeatcrackers.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:Rygelforcedtoeatcrackers.PNG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:07, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Farscape season 2 episode 4.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Farscape season 2 episode 4.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Crewresponse.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:Crewresponse.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:48, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rygelforcedtoeatcrackers.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:Rygelforcedtoeatcrackers.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:57, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Traltixx.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:Traltixx.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nearrape.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Nearrape.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:56, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Johnride.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:Johnride.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:04, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

The X-Files peer review
As you're a top contributor to the X-Files article, I'd like to inform you that the article is currently undergoing a peer review. This is an effort to get the article up to featured article standards for an eventual FA nomination, in the hopes that it can be featured on Wikipedia's main page on or around the release date for the new X-Files movie entitled The X-Files: I Want to Believe. If you can, please take a look and offer input on improving the article. Thank you. Equazcion •✗/C • 18:17, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Bill Wyatt
An article that you have been involved in editing, Bill Wyatt, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Bill Wyatt. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Philosopher Let us reason together. 23:52, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Something Is Squeezing My Skull
Simply being placed on a radio station's playlist isn't noteworthy - can you imagine how long and unwieldy the list would be if we were to list all the radio stations that a song was played on? The Don't Speak article doesn't just say that it was placed on a radio station's playlist, it mentions that it reached number one of a recognised national chart - the Billboard Hot 100 Airplay. --JD554 (talk) 18:28, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I still don't think being on a radio station's playlist is worthy of mention in a song's article. WP:RECENTISM will probably say why better than I can. --JD554 (talk) 18:51, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Again, Real Love (John Lennon song) isn't the same either, that article discusses the fact it wasn't on a playlist and the effect that had (angry fans, poor charting) and the fact it was reported by independent sources (reuters). --JD554 (talk) 18:56, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Citation issue
I am trying to find citations for the Hanscom Air Force Base page. I am assuming that you used the main air force history page in your creation, but I haven't been able to find anything that basically backs it up, since the links have changed. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:49, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Wow, this was almost six months ago. If you had the page, I could use the Internet Archive and go from there. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 20:42, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

You're invited!
Hello, Acegikmo1,

You are invited meet with your fellow Wikipedians by attending the Montréal meetup scheduled on Sunday, June 27, 2010; between 1500 - 1700 to be held at the Comité Social Centre Sud (CSCS), located at 1710 Beaudry, in Montréal. You can sign up at the meetup page.

The meetup is happening in concurrence with RoCoCo 2010, a free, bilingual, weekend unconference including many people involved with Wikis both within the Wikipedia/Wikimedia Community and abroad. You do not need to attend the conference to sign up for the Wikimeetup, but you are certainly welcome! Bastique ☎ call me!

(PS: Please share this with those you know who might not be on the delivery list, i.e. Users in Montreal/Quebec) Delivered by SoxBot (talk) 00:41, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Jack Welch/Archives/2011
Hey, please see this. SHIMONSHA (talk) 16:46, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting
Message delivered by Dominic at 09:07, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.

2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting
You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 09:36, 16 July 2013 (UTC)


 * I know you are far, far away - but if you are in town on July 31st in Boston, I owe you a drink :) –  SJ  +  02:47, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Cube.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cube.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:42, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

New England Wikipedia Day @ MIT: Saturday Jan 18
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

You're invited!
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

You've got red on you
You do know that the suicide methods you posted are accessible via google by searching 'suicide'?

Redzimus (talk) 17:15, 16 September 2014 (UTC) 

This Friday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA
You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA on October 16! (drop-in any time, 6-9pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:27, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Sunday July 16: New England Wiknic @ Cambridge, MA
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Please claim your upload(s): File:HanscomBrown.jpg
Hi, This media was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices,

However, due to changes in the copyright situation in some jurisdictions, there is a need to ensure media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed. It would be appreciated if you were able to confirm that it was your own work, by marking it as own, Fully completeing the information block, and leaving an acknowledgement on the file description page to indicate that you've accepted the license shown (and updated the information accordingly. If you have other uploads, please consider "claiming" them in a similar manner, You can find a list of files you have created [ here].

If you don't want to keep your media on English Wikipedia, please nominate it for deletion under Criteria G7 of the Criteria for Speedy deletion ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:47, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:16, 14 September 2018 (UTC)