User talk:Acetotyce/Archive 7

Colony Capital
I am trying to update the content of Colony Capital's wiki page to the correct information and you keep reverting back to the old incorrect information. How can I update the page without you doing that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.119.146.13 (talk) 15:56, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the cuteness
The adorable kitten picture was much appreciated. :) Seanette (talk) 19:05, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jerusalem
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jerusalem. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 20:15, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

youre not welcomed in my talkpage
You cant possibly expect an editor, an editor who got me blocked, to befriend without a formal apology. you have no idea how infuriating it is to see this editor do disruptive, destructive, discussion poisoning, and be unscathed without even a single warning. When I get blocked OUT OF AN ACCIDENT. And it fathoms me how bias admins can be now.

You...dont recognize me, not even by a longshot, to recognize me you would have to recognize the pain and stress I went through, and overall in the end an unfair block because of this editor, and how insulting it is for this editor to imagine it was all done.

Easy for him! He didnt get blocked (over a frocking accident). Youre not welcomed in my talkpage until you trully recognize me. Until then, your comments only infuriate me. I want justice, and I wont rest till I get it.Lucia Black (talk) 00:34, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Good luck making that warning stick. Making a comment on contributors doesnt mean is a personal attack if they are the topic. Last warning. Dont make a comment in my talkpage again. Or I WILL bring it to ANI.Lucia Black (talk) 00:50, 12 June 2013 (UTC)


 * PBASH, I am going to change the warning at Lucia's talk from your level 1 or 2 to a 4 just based on a) the italics you wrote and b) the context surrounding it and this is heading to ANI. This is beyond unacceptable. She is doing hounding by giving you a no-edit rule. Generally, you're not supposed to refactor like that, but to make it easier, I'm going to and Lucia is headed to ANI. BTW, cool talk page Happy editing, Prabash. WorldTraveller101BreaksFixes 01:52, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I welcome the kind words, but Lucia Black has made her bed with her own actions and refuses to change or take suggestions from other users. It didn't take two posts before she attacked me in our very first interaction and it occurs with almost every editor in any opposing viewpoint. She is aware that her words are personal attacks; and that calling me "destructive" is PA as well. I've done all that I can to ensure better coverage, clearer articles, I've added thousands of sources to hundreds of pages, defended Wikipedia from 3000+ vandal posts; corrected over 50,000 articles with typos, addressed entire backlogs and cleaned up over 1500 issues in WP:ANIME's backlog. The issue seems like a farce when my biggest issue with her is deliberately inserting false material in the Ghost in the Shell articles (like the Puppetmaster, the one I pushed farthest on). I want to work with Lucia; but I don't ask for her apology, past is past to me. As long she holds this enmity nothing in that article space will be repaired or corrected by myself; and I am a sort of scholar in that subject area. Not an industry expert; or anything so grand, I'm just a humble editor wishing all the problems would vanish in another month's peace. Though her idea of peace is fealty and would force me to lie and state I had "destructive/bad faith" intentions in editing. Which couldn't be further from the truth. Sorry for rambling; I'm going to go back to addressing a backlog or two. I just wish this conflict would end; I have been trying to resolve it for months, but I'm not the one to make the decision for her. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 02:17, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * PBASH, you should feel very fortunate that you're not blocked as well as WorldTraveller - you encouraged his poor behaviour because of yuor own misunderstandings. I have seen your post where you somehow beleived that Lucia was being uncivil by requesting that you remain off of her talkpage - wrong.  You then continued to post there - that SHOULD have been a block.  You cannot with a good heart call someone uncivil on one hand, while you're hounding the crap of them and being uncivil yourself on the other.  Now you went and encouraged WT to go on the offensive - wrongly.  Now he's blocked.  Well done. (✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 10:46, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I never wanted WT101 to go on the offensive, all I wanted was a suggestion wether i should bring Lucia to ANI or not, at the time I didn't even want her in ANI I just wanted his opinion on the situation if he and more users agree with me, I would bring it to ANI . I was really nice to Lucia, I was met with a hostile notice to leave her talkpage and I overreacted, now WT101 is in a block that shouldn't even be there. This is not right, there should be warnings, before he gets blocked. I am done with this issue and I don't want it to haunt my life --Prabash ''' What?  11:16, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback (external)
You have new messages on Pratyya Ghosh's The Test Wiki talkpage. Feel free to remove this message.  smt cha hal  talk 14:09, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah i'll check it out. Cheers --Prabash ''' What?  15:15, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Edits
Hi

You recently cancelled my edits on a joke wikipedia page that was vengefully set up. I edited it in an attempt to tame it down as it also mentioned employers and other aspects. By simply reading the contents you can tell it is a joke. Can you please either delete the page or revert to my previous edits. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editor1276 (talk • contribs) 00:47, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * It wasnt a joke edit but it seemed unconstructive due to all the damages done to the article. Dont worry, as I reverted the changes, the article should not be deleted yet, but it lacks sources. Best wait. --Prabash ''' What?  00:57, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your response- I am confused as to what to do. The page is clearly defamatory and it is damaging as it mentions names and employers who would not take this lightly. It has obviously been set up as a joke and I would like it deleted as soon as possible. Can anyone just merely create a wiki page and say whatever they want without any recourse available to the defamed party? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editor1276 (talk • contribs) 01:11, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey have you tried discussing the issue on the talk page maybe that should solve your problems because another user will come about and solve the issue or find a resolution for that article issue. --Prabash ''' What?  01:15, 13 June 2013 (UTC)


 * PBASH607, we don't "wait" if there's a violation of WP:BLP, we don't discuss the issue on the talk page first if there's a violation of WP:BLP, we remove the problematic material first and then discuss it. That is, unless you have some certainty that the issue is not a violation of WP:BLP - and I'm not wholly convinced that you're in a good position to decide that. Now, which page are we talking about? I think you might be better off removing the contested material until there can be some balanced discussion of it. (Oh, and if any material is unsourced and about a living person and it's even potentially controversial, it must be removed immediately - that's what the policy says.) --Demiurge1000 (talk) 04:11, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Demi...it was Gareth Martin, which was deleted as G10 (✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 11:01, 13 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks BW. All's well that ends well, then. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 16:52, 13 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm taking an adoption program soon. Have you read the revisions on the article? --Prabash ''' What?  10:23, 13 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I suggest you avoid reverting "vandalism" on articles relating to living people until your adoption program explains the WP:BLP policy to you properly, then. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 16:52, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Have you read the reverts, did you see what the reversions were? I am a star contributor for fighting vandalism and I won't stop it. I read WP:BLP already and I will again during my proposed adoption program. What I suggest to you is to read the revisions carefully and understand why I reverted it. I wasn't the only one who reverted the edits, there were other people who reverted that edit. I am not going to stop vandalism reverting for ones opinion on one revert. --Prabash ''' What?  17:03, 13 June 2013 (UTC)


 * I sincerely hope you have better luck with that attitude than WorldTraveller101 did. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 18:36, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay sorry I'm being a real dipshit toda, Im going through tons of stress, yeah apologies for that, I will stop vandal fighting for BLP's until my adoption program is complete. Sorry --Prabash ''' What?  18:51, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Brighton Park crossing
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Brighton Park crossing. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 09:15, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!
Hey thanks! --Prabash ''' What?  00:55, 14 June 2013 (UTC)