User talk:Acharya63

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, your contributions are not written in an English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Marathi language; did you know there is a Marathi Wikipedia? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! If you need help, please feel free to notify me on my talk page.  ✝iѵ ɛɳ  २२४० †ลℓк †๏ мэ 07:57, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Welcome!

नमस्कार,, आणि विकिपीडियावर आपले स्वागत आहे.विकिपीडियात आपण करू इच्छित असलेल्या सुधारणांच्या प्रयत्नांचे स्वागत करतानाच,कळवण्यास खेद वाटतो की आपण केलेले लेखन योगदान उपयोगी होऊ शकेल अशा इंग्रजीत नाही असे माझे मत आहे.आपला मराठी भाषेशी अधिक चांगला परिचय असेल असे वाटते,आपणास माहित आहे का की मराठी भाषेत सुद्धा विकिपीडिया उपलब्ध आहे ? आपण कदाचित मराठीभाषी विकिपीडियावर लेखन योगदान करणे अधीक पसंत कराल.मराठी विकिपीडिया आपल्या कडून कोणत्या लेखन योगदानाची विशेषत्वाने विनंती करते आणि इतर अधीक माहिती करिता मराठी विकिपीडियाच्यावतीने येथे उपलब्ध केलेले पान पहा.
 * सुस्वागतम्!

किंवा आपण आपले इंग्रजी लेखन स्वतःच्या सदस्य पानावर करून घेऊन ते इथे चढवण्या आधी भाषीक सुयोग्यतेच्या दृष्टीने तपासण्या करिता येथे महाराष्ट्रीय विकिपीडियन्सना अथवा इथे इंग्रजी विकिपीडियावरील भारतीय विकिपीडियनना सुद्धा सहाय्य विनंती करू शकता.आपल्या प्रयत्नांकरिता धन्यवाद ! आणि कोणत्याही स्थितीत, विकिपीडिया प्रकल्पावर आपले स्वागतच आहे, आपणास कोणत्याही सहाय्याची आवश्यकता भासल्यास कृपया माझ्या चर्चा पानावर मोकळेपणाने मांडा, अथवा आपली शंका/सहाय्य विनंती मराठी भाषेत मांडावयाची झाल्यास मराठी विकिपीडिया स्वागत आणि साहाय्य चमू आपल्या शंकांचे/सहाय्य विनंत्यांचे मराठी विकिपीडिया मदत मुख्यालयात स्वागत करते.  ✝iѵ ɛɳ  २२४० †ลℓк †๏ мэ 07:57, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Acharya63, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! South Nashua (talk) 20:27, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vasant Joglekar


The article Vasant Joglekar has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 00:09, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vasant Joglekar


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Vasant Joglekar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 06:03, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Vasant Joglekar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vasant Joglekar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Vasant Joglekar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 18:02, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marathi people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maharashtrian Brahmin ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Marathi_people check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Marathi_people?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

No barnstar
I don't really do barnstar awards but I would like you to know that your efforts are appreciated. You are working in one of the more fraught topic areas and you are generally doing a very good job of it. We don't always agree and I am sure that will continue to be the case but it is all about attitude. And you have the right attitude in spades. Well done. - Sitush (talk) 01:28, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Sitush, Thanks so much for this message - it is very encouraging and I really appreciate it. But honestly, I wish I had your attitude, your command over English as well as your patience. I was reading your argument with someone here Talk:Raju and really admired how you approached it - your patience to go through every source and tolerating all the unnecessary name calling that he/she was engaging in. Frankly, I would not have been able to handle it so well. Also, hope you are doing and recovering well - you had mentioned a surgical procedure on your talk page some time back . Best Regards. - Acharya63 (talk) 03:22, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Malusare, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Koli and Satara ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Malusare check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Malusare?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Acharya page
Hi Acharya63, I have watch-listed the page. But here are some tips:
 * Please turn on Twinkle in your preferences. Use the TW menu to give welcome messages and/or warning messages to the warring editors as necessary.
 * You can bring the page to admin attention or file WP:AN3 reports via the TW menu.

If you want to know how to do something, please feel free to ask. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 09:57, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Hi Kautilya3, Thanks so much. Best Regards, Acharya63 (talk) 21:39, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maratha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stewart Gordon ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Maratha check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Maratha?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Regarding a article
Hi Acharya63, something wrong is happening on the page that you maintained integrity - Maharashtrian Brahmin

AR767 (talk) 16:40 Saturday, 6 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi AR767, it would have been better if that page had been named "Marathi Brahmin" to indicate Marathi speaking Brahmins instead of Maharashtrian. Probably it should be renamed to Marathi Brahmin to avoid confusion? Not sure if the other editors would agree though. Thanks Acharya63 (talk) 22:52, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Yes, that's better. AR767 (talk) 7:38 Sunday, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Nana Patekar
Hi Acharya, hope you are doing well. Just to know you Nana Patekar was not born in Maratha caste. He is from Bhandari community (caste) which comes under OBC category whereas Maratha caste comes under Open category here in Maharashtra. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sainath468 (talk • contribs) 07:14, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi Sainath468, Please read his interview. He says he is maratha. Do you have another citation for his caste? Thansk Acharya63 (talk) 07:17, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi, that doesn't mean he was born in Maratha family. Maratha in general means Mavala (warrior) of Shivaji. In Shivaji's army there were lot of other caste people (अठरा पगड जातीचे लोक) more than 96 kuli Maratha, everyone was called as Maratha. I haven't any proof from Nana Patekar to show you he belongs to Bhandari caste, but I have seen Balasaheb Thackeray's speech in Dasara melava where he mentioned about Bhandari caste and Nana Patekar. Morever I have seen Akhil Bhartiya Bhandari caste head meeting him in personal with their agenda. Again that is not a valid reference. I think Nana Patekar don't believe in caste system as well so better to not mention about his caste. Read this article- https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/Nana-Patekar-Remove-column-of-cast-and-religion-I-dont-believe-in-religion/articleshow/50947956.cms — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sainath468 (talk • contribs) 07:29, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * This website also mentions him as a maratha https://www.marathamatrimony.com/articles/trivia.php. Anyway, we can discuss on talk page. Could it be that Mr.Thackeray was referring to the help provided by Patekar to this community?

Yes Balasaheb Thackeray clearly mentioned about his community. Watch this interview - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfCnnRRVuPU Can you read following article if you know Marathi? Tarun Bharat is well known Marathi news paper. https://www.tarunbharat.com/news/578531 http://www.sarkarnama.in/marathi-political-news-bjp-konkan-nana-patekar-22821 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sainath468 (talk • contribs) 07:47, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * OK, it looks like he is a Bhandari. Not sure why he misrepresented his caste or maybe the interviewer misunderstood. In any case, we cannot add his caste now because those citations are not self identifications. We also need to remove him from List of Maratha people. Thanks Acharya63 (talk) 08:11, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Uttaranarayana Anuvaka moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Uttaranarayana Anuvaka, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 15:10, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Sure, Thanks Hitro!-Acharya63 (talk) 03:33, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Panth Maharaj for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Panth Maharaj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Panth Maharaj until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed,Rosguill talk 21:54, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Panth Maharaj for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Panth Maharaj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Panth Maharaj until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed,Rosguill talk 21:55, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy New Year
Dear Acharya63, Wish you a Happy and Productive New Year.I hope you are able to resume your editing activities.Regards.Jonathansammy (talk) 17:32, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Dear Jonathansammy, Sorry for responding so late. I logged in today after several weeks. Thank you for your wishes and Happy New Year to you as well. I had taken a break due to an operation and related health issues but will resume editing soon. Thanks Acharya63 (talk) 04:53, 13 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Dear Acharya63, Wish you a speedy recovery.Please take your time in resuming editing. All the best.Jonathansammy (talk) 17:32, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Looking for help
Hi,

I was looking for some small help.Recently I created a new article en:Kithaab i.e. hi:किताब (नाटक)-a play about women rights issues- which has been copy edited and is ready for translation & being translated in various languages like Tamil ta:கித்தாப் Telugu te:కితాబ్ (మలయాళ నాటకం).

Looking for your possible help in translating the article en:Kithaab hi:किताब (नाटक) to your language Wikipedia. If you are unable to spare time yourself then may be you like to refer the same to some other translator.

Thanking you, with warm regards Bookku (talk) 04:58, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Brahmin percent in Mahatashtra
Hi Acharya63, why did you change the Brahmin percentage in Maratha MRRaja001 (talk) 09:47, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi MRRaja001, I have not removed the value(10%) you added. I kept both values shown by both sources. In wikipedia, Christophe Jaffrelot is considered a very reliable source. I think what it means is that the population was initially low in Maharashtra but due to migration it is probably close to 10%. As per WP:RS, the academic source( by Vora and Jaffrelot) is considered much more superior to newspaper sources as we generally do not know the background of the person who wrote the newspaper article. Secondly, academic articles are peer reviewed whereas newspapers could be opinion pieces. Please see Reliable_sources for this discussion. Wikipedia generally relies on scholarly sources but newspaper sources are OK too. If you do not agree with the change, we can discuss here and use proper wording for the statements. I am OK if you want to change it to 10% although I have mentioned this number already on that page. Thanks Acharya63 (talk) 10:11, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * But this reference is saying that in 1963 itself the population of Brahmins in Maharashtra is 8%. "The Brahmin who form about 8% of the population of Maharashtra" - (Book: ) . MRRaja001 (talk) 10:18, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The difference is because of the years. I will update it to 10%. Thanks Acharya63 (talk) 10:24, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Again Deccan College Post-Graduate and Research Institute, published a book in 2007 with the updates of population. (Book:). MRRaja001 (talk) 10:38, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Yes, I agree with you. I think that 4% is some old value. Hence I have updated the Maratha page to show that the modern value is 10%. Acharya63 (talk) 10:44, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Great! I'm glad we could figure this out. :) - MRRaja001 (talk) 10:46, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Are we talking about Maharashtrian brahmins being 10% of the state's population or the number  also includes brahmins immigrant  resident in Maharashtra? Thanks.Jonathansammy (talk) 13:52, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Jonathansammy, the reference says about only Maharashtrian Brahmins, and doesn't include brahmins immigrant resident. MRRaja001 (talk) 18:09, 25 March 2019
 * Hi MRRaja001, does the reference explicitly say that Maharashtrian brahmin form 10% of the population of the state of Maharashtra or is it 10% of the Marathi speaking population of the state? Thanks.Jonathansammy (talk) 20:27, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Jonathansammy, The quote is "While comprising only 9% of the Maharashtrian population, the eight endogamous Brahmin castes studied by Karve and Malhotra)". It does mean the Maharashtrian Brahmin population (not only Marathi). MRRaja001 (talk) 17:30, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi MRRaja001, I am confused. Maharashtrian brahmin is synonymous with Marathi brahmin and Maharashtrian is synonymous with Marathi people, and not all residents of the state of Maharashtra.Thanks.Jonathansammy (talk) 18:41, 29 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Jonathansammy, "The eight endogamous Brahmin castes" means Deshastha (Rigvedi,Shukla Yajurvedi, Madhyandina, Kanva)  Chitpavan, Karhade, Saraswat, Devrukhe Brahmins. Previously Rigvedi,Shukla Yajurvedi, Madhyandina, Kanva were all calculated separately and they used to maintain endogamy but now the intermarriages are quite common. So this does mean that the 9% Brahmins mentioned in the academic research book are Maharashtrian Brahmins. MRRaja001 (talk) 11:12, 17 April 2019 (UTC)


 * MRRaja001, 9% brahmin population of Maharashtra would mean about 12-13% of Maharashtrian brahmins in total Marathi speaking population.I have not come across any serious academic source which indicates the Maharashtrian brahmin population being that high.If you have a source then please include it in the article.Thanks.Jonathansammy (talk) 13:53, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
 * MRRaja001 Let us continue this discussion on the talk page of the article rather than on User Acharya's talk page.I am copy /pasting the thread on the article page. Thanks.Jonathansammy (talk) 13:53, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Creation of an article
Hi Acharya63, can we create a page saying "List of Notable Maharashtrian Brahmins". MRRaja001 (talk) 03:14, 30 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi MRRaja001, we already have the lists under each Brahmin page - like Deshastha , Koknastha etc. Probably we can add a section to the Maharashtrian Brahmin page (instead of creating a new page) and point it to the other pages. My view is to avoid duplicating data if possible because it is hard to maintain multiple copies and one of them can quickly go out of sync. we already have a List_of_Brahmins and I recently added Chitpawan, Deshastha and Karhade to it. Thanks Acharya63 (talk) 21:49, 5 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Yeah! you are right i agree with you.MRRaja001 (talk) 1:00, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Deshastha Bramhin
Hi Acharya63, I think this is not published by Popular Prakashan https://books.google.co.in/books?id=VBQwAQAAIAAJ MRRaja001 (talk) 01:50, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Regarding a reference MRRaja001 (talk) 01:57, 6 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi MRRaja001, you may be right about the publisher. I incorrectly wrote Popular Prakashan in the comment when I edited the Deshastha Brahmin page. However, the real problem with that source is that it is the State series. It says "People of India :Karnataka". Sitush said that the people of India (state series only) is not reliable because it plagiarizes British era sources but the "People of India" published by Oxford University Press is fine. You can see Sitush's comment here=>Talk:Deshastha_Brahmin/Archive_2. I have access to the Oxford series in the University library here and can try to see if I can find references for that statement the next time I visit. Thanks Acharya63 (talk) 03:06, 6 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Yeah! Sure. MRRaja001 (talk) 03:11, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi Acharya63, is it necessary to write Deshastha Brahmins as Debra's and Konkanastha Brahmins as Kobras. Please remove it. MRRaja001 (talk) 04:11, 7 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi MRRaja001, I have removed it. It is not necessary and does not add any value to wikipedia. Personally, I do not find it offensive - it was very common in marathi brahmin circles in Pune (amongst friends) to ask if a person was a Debra or Kobra. But anyways, I removed it as it is not necessary. Thanks Acharya63 (talk) 00:50, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

But considering superior to other cannot be used if so many caste can claim superior based on shastra basis but wiki cannot entertain such statement. Joshi punekar (talk) 19:37, 14 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Joshi punekar, it is not out of context or fringe opinion. Several sources support that the Deshastha are the original brahmin community of Maharashtra. Also, the "superior opinion" is just an "opinion". Here is what the source says (and there are multiple sources that support it)-"As the original Brahmin inhabitants of Maharashtra they[Deshastha] were held in greatest esteem and considered themselves superior to other Brahmins". .Thanks Acharya63 (talk) 06:29, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Acharya63Like this I can show lot of sources teaming citpavans and saraswats as superior.But as per neutrality we don’t place that. thanks Joshi punekar (talk) 11:07, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Regarding recent revert
I have clearly mentioned nor genetic nor racist nor mythology,it’s general research by gurve ,if possible go through the citation. Joshi punekar (talk) 19:41, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Take time and go through the reference then come to conclusion weather it is genetic or not. Joshi punekar (talk) 19:47, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Acharya63

Hi Joshi punekar, we can discuss this on the talk page of Maharashtrian Brahmin. Thanks Acharya63 (talk) 05:25, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

I have already given clarification in talk page.Citation clearly tells it’s not racism nor genetics .I hope you went through talk page. Joshi punekar (talk) 18:43, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi Joshi punekar, according to the opinions of other users it is closely related to genetics and racist. Please see the Deshastha Brahmin talk page.Thanks Acharya63 (talk) 20:55, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Regarding a doubt
Hi Acharya63, I have a doubt can I use this book as reference to create any article. Even though it's published by Oxford University Press - the year was 1925, which is before Independence. MRRaja001 (talk) 10:56, 27 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi MRRaja001, I personally do not have strong opinions on Raj era sources but other senior editors do not allow any "subjective opinions" based on Raj era sources. Is there something specific you needed to add? Can you find equivalent information in modern sources? At one point there were a lot of Raj era sources on the Deshastha Brahmin page. Then some senior editors removed them. Thanks Acharya63 (talk) 16:29, 27 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Ok. Actually I started writing article of Sakharam Bapu Bokil. I found some information regarding him in that book, So I asked. I'll search for modern sources. Will you do me a favour. Can you help me in finding out dates (DOB & DOD) and place of birth and place of death of him. MRRaja001 (talk) 16:48, 27 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi MRRaja001, sure. I will try to find more information about him. By any chance do you know the name of the book that might have it(I have access to some great university libraries and might be able to get it)? Also, I think non-controversial information like DOB etc. might be Ok to source from Raj era historians like Parasnis. I am not sure what other editors think of this. Acharya63 (talk) 01:31, 30 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi MRRaja001, if you look at the Samarth Ramdas page, you will notice that the D.B.Parasnis has been sourced. So I think it would be Ok to use this book as long at it is only for historical events/biographies. Thanks Acharya63 (talk) 04:33, 2 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Okay, Thanks for the info Acharya63 MRRaja001 (talk) 05:10, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Uttaranarayana Anuvaka


Hello, Acharya63. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Uttaranarayana Anuvaka".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 09:36, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
You are most welcome sir.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:18, 26 May 2019 (UTC) 

Thank you so much Fylindfotberserk :-) Acharya63 (talk) 17:09, 28 May 2019 (UTC)


 * You are welcome - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:16, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Saraswat Brahmin recent edits
Would you kindly take a look at the recent edits in the article including this new one by Acchut Sharma. I haven't checked those but I feel some original researches might be there and it requires copy-editing atleast. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:25, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Dear Fylindfotberserk, I think you are right in assuming that it is WP:OR. I did not study about the Saraswat community in my study about the Gramanyas in Maharashtra hence I avoid editing that page. We can talk to WBG and ask him to look at it as he might be more knowledgeable. Thanks Acharya63 (talk) 18:10, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shibani Dandekar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maharashtrian ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Shibani_Dandekar check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Shibani_Dandekar?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Your deletion of RS-supported fact
Your deletion here of RS-supported fact is not proper. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joshi&diff=next&oldid=911457223

She is in fact notable for her suicide. If you look at the RS coverage of her, it is largely about her suicide. That is how we determine what is notable in a person's biography. Not by one editor's subjective preference. --2604:2000:E010:1100:803B:A5E6:BBE8:39D5 (talk) 02:21, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
 * ok, I read the article. You are correct. I will revert my own change unless someone else does it. Acharya63 (talk) 02:34, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Many thanks. --2604:2000:E010:1100:803B:A5E6:BBE8:39D5 (talk) 03:25, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Help regarding Arjuna
Bhau, please take a look at Arjuna page. It's been a victim of spam edits in last few days. Please make necessary reverts and do req for protection cuz it's not gonna stop anywhere near in the future. Jai Hind, Jai Maharashtra. HinduKshatrana (talk) 11:26, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Maratha Caste Page
I would like you to know that I am not the same individual as the one operating the novice User profile Sanskritputra. Please refer to the discussion panel opened up in the talk page of Maratha caste page before reverting my edits due to needless vandalism by activities of this user. 115.96.147.106 (talk) 05:17, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, you are a user from Mumbai. Please create account so it will be easier to communicate with you. Also, you cannot delet sourced content.

I will make an account soon sir/ma'am, thank you. The sourced content deleted was based on the reliability of the source as inferior to the newer content with a source considered more reliable, however I have restored it. 115.96.147.106 (talk) 05:48, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello, this is my new account The Storm Nimbus (talk) 05:52, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

The term Maratha has not even existed historically. Most sources agree the Marathas were simple a group of people (and by virtue of the term "people" yes castes) residing in the region now known as Maharashtra. Assuming that every single person from a certain time frame living in a certain region is a "agricultural peasant" is hilarious to say the least. Alfredo722 (talk) 02:34, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi Alfredo722, please see the quotes from the citations. They were definitely not all yeomen (landowners) as you say. The sources say they were a mix of peasants(kunbi), lohar(ironsmith), dhangar, etc. However, the latter two were probably left out as they are a bit offensive and hence agricultural castes is a closely related term. This is not my personal opinion . Acharya63 (talk) 03:16, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

The North Indian Chtiragupt Kayastha of upper provinces, benaras and bihar as a sub groups of the umbrella Kayastha, caste of scribes of India.
I saw your recent edits to Kayastha. I understand that you mean well but are from Maharastra and not very well aware of North Indian caste system which is the cradle of Hinduism. Since I understand that you are a learned person hence I am sharing this information along with references. I hope you will take the pains to go through them and satisfy yourself.

 The Sanskrit dictionary at Hindunet.org defines Kayastha as follows: ka_yastha, ka_yata a man belonging to the writer-caste; a tribe of bra_hman.as whose employment is writing (Ka.)(Ka.lex.)[6]

 BRAHMINS by vedah.net [2] is an arcticle on who the brahmins are and the various sub-groups of Brahmins. The Kayastha Brahmins are mentioned at sl.no. 15 (in alphabetic order).

 The Brahmins : A List of Brahmin Communities is an extensive list prepared by Kamat.com [3] of all Brahmin communities in India. Kayastha Brahmins are mentioned (in alphabetic order).

 Vyoma Samhita quoted in Shabda−Kalpadrum says: The Kayasthas have sprung from the kaya or body of Lord Brahma. They are similar in rank to Brahmans.

The major differences between this ministerial class and the proper priestly class, started around 1500 years ago in the Kingdom of Kashmir, where each accused the other of misusing their power. [7] Colonial translation of Kalhana's Rajatarangini: A Chronicle of the Kings of Kashmir: By M.A. Stein. Nikhil Srivastava (talk) 05:25, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!
Happy Holidays text.png Hello Acharya63: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:24, 22 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Happy New Year, Acharya63!


Happy New Year! Acharya63, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:53, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Disambiguation link notification for January 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chitpavan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Chitpavan check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Chitpavan?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Regarding a suggestion
Hi Acharya63, How are you? I'm planning to expand the articles of Thanjavur Marathi Diwans like R. Raghunatha Rao, with more content about their Administration and works. Do you have any interest on this topic. Cheers !!! MRRaja001 (talk) 17:28, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Test
Test TravelToTheTemple (talk) 14:35, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Leaving wikipedia
Acharya63 has left wikipedia in Feb 2020 and has requested that the account be closed. Acharya63 is unable to log into the account. TravelToTheTemple (talk) 14:39, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

TravelToTheTemple (talk) 14:40, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

TravelToTheTemple (talk) 14:44, 26 June 2021 (UTC)