User talk:AchatesFortis

Welcome!
Hello, AchatesFortis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Book of Exodus does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! tgeorgescu (talk) 14:51, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for the warm welcome. I really appreciate your hospitality and collegiality.

Could you explain how my edit violated the NPOV policy? I provided a citation from a reputable scholarly text that is used in university courses in America. The view presented in this book is not a unique or novel perspective taken by the authors of the text, but is itself cited from other works. In other words, it is a "significant view...published by reliable sources" on the topic at hand.

Prior to my edit, the article claimed that there is scholarly consensus that Exodus is a myth. As a former graduate student in Biblical Languages and Literature and a current secondary school teacher of Scripture and Theology, I can arrest to the inaccuracy of this claim. I understand, of course, and fully sympathize, that Wikipedia is neutral to religious and philosophical claims. However, the edit I made is not endorsing a point of view on the historicity of the Book of Exodus, but rather augmenting it's description of scholarly views do as to reflect the truth of what scholars are saying. Please explain how this violates neutrality. I see it as eliminating an inaccuracy that is, in fact, based on either an innocent ignorance or an undetected bias.

Again, thank you for your kind and collegial message. I do appreciate your professionalism and decency in this forum. All the best! AchatesFortis (talk) 06:25, 14 November 2021 (UTC)


 * attest (typo) AchatesFortis (talk) 06:26, 14 November 2021 (UTC)