User talk:Achencool123

Speedy deletion nomination of 1920-2010
Hello Achencool123,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 1920-2010 for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kges1901 (talk) 09:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 1922-2014
Hello Achencool123,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 1922-2014 for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kges1901 (talk) 09:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 1930-2015
Hello Achencool123,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 1930-2015 for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kges1901 (talk) 09:29, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lists of centenarians, you may be blocked from editing. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 09:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 1922-
Hello Achencool123,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 1922- for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kges1901 (talk) 09:34, 9 February 2015 (UTC)