User talk:Aciram/Archives/2017/June

Thomas Schreiber (innkeeper)
You recently created a new article called Thomas Schreiber (innkeeper). Please read WP:CITE and please add individual page numbers to the inline citations (WP:CITE) -- PBS (talk) 14:11, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, I am aware of this, but Wikipedia rules allows for anyone to contribute as far as they are able, and that no one has any obligations as we all work voluntarily, and are not payed salaries for the time we give to it. I no longer have the book in my possession, and can not ad the page numbers. Some one else may eventually have the opportunity to do so. An article in Wikipedia is never finished, and can always have more things added to it by anyone of its editors who has the ability to make it better than before. I have done so myself with articles created by others. If every article in Wikipedia was expected to be complete and finished before it was posted, then not many articles would have ever been started here. In that case, I would simply not be active her at all, and doubt very many of my articles, created since ten years back, greatly developed in collaboration by other editors in line with Wikipedia policy since then, would have ever been started. I appreciate Wikipedia's policy, that anyone contribute as far as they are able, and an article is never finished, which makes it possible for me to contribute despite my diagnosis - if people with anxiety problems are not welcome in Wikipedia, then I would happily simply end my contributions. Thank you.--Aciram (talk) 14:14, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * You created this article less than 48 hours ago, you added the bulk of the information to it at 12:37, 26 May 2017 (diff) 26 hours before you say "I no longer have the book in my possession"! I have asked you before to provide page numbers for books and have pointed out the guidelines for how to cite a book including page numbers. Why did you create a new article citing a book without page numbers? -- PBS (talk) 16:21, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * You have included quotes in the article and the WP:V policy is very explicit about this:

"::Attribute all quotations ... to a reliable, published source using an inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article. Cite the source clearly and precisely (specifying page, section, or such divisions as may be appropriate).(section WP:BURDEN)"


 * --PBS (talk) 16:33, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I am guessing that you copied this article from the one on Swedish Wikipedia (history). If you did, then when you did you probably breached copyright as you have not stated in the history of the article that you have made a copy (see Copying within Wikipedia. If you make any such copies you must meet the policy requirements of Wikipedia, for the text that is copied including WP:Copyright, and in this case WP:V, and of course the other two content polices must also be met (WP:NOR and WP:NPOV). -- PBS (talk) 16:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Dear Aciram, user PBS asked me to look at this, because she/he wants a smooth discussion and nothing else. As you know I am aware of your diagnosis (we have talked before, just info for other readers). There are noone trying to scare you away, I know that the writing here for some can be the thing keepong their life flowting (I'm thinking of the latr user Obelix, my friend who also had a diagnosis.
 * The problems here in this and the above discussion are the same, siteing the sources. On svwp we are going more and more towards hardwr citing, to make it easier to see what the source says. I myself had, and have problems to solve a POV article on svwp due to bad usage of sources that fooled us to so it became a "good article" before I investigated it, sv:Junge freiheit. As I can see here PBS does not think like that anout you, but just want it easier to find the facts in the sources. It is much easier if the one who added the facts cite the source thba someone else has to look through a lot of material (ad I have to do with the Junge freihet article). When you have the strengh to cite it would be great if you did it. If you think it is hard, technically, you can write it on the discussion page and we can help inserting it in the article. Best regards Adville (talk) 18:07, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Marianne Bernadotte
Hello! I know you are interested in the life stories of exceptional women. This one has just been updated and expanded here on English WP according to a new book about her. Perhaps you'd like to update the Swedish article accordingly? As I think you know, I do not do any work there now. Just thought you might appreciate my mentioning this you you. Friendly greeting! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:40, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * My interests lay in "Women of history"; normally women before 1900, but not living people, or royalty as such. I am sure the article of Marianne Bernadotte on Swwp will be expanded with relevant sources by users with interest in the subject. --Aciram (talk) 15:10, 9 June 2017 (UTC)