User talk:Aciram/Archives/2020/July

Signora Violante (Q18534920)
Please don't create redirects with Wikidata Q numbers in them, these get routinely deleted at Redirects for Discussion. The correct solution here is to merge two items at Wikidata, and, which are about the same person. Fram (talk) 13:54, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
 * This is not made out of malice from my part. I do not have the knowledge in how to merge them. I do have the knowledge on how to make new articles. These false red links are numerous in the red link-lists, and they create a problem in my work. If I cause hostility and conflict and appear malicious by performing these redirects, I will try to ignore them even if the continue to create a problem in my work. I can't deal with conflicts because of my anxiety issues, so I must again assure you that my intent was not malicious. I will try to remember to ignore the problem these red links cause in the future. Thank you. --Aciram (talk) 14:00, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh, I didn't think you did anything malicious or had any bad intent, I just wanted to tell you a better way to deal with them. You can also just ignore them, or raise the issue at the Women in Red talk page so someone else can help. I refuse to edit Wikidata, so I can't help you with these, but my post was non intended to attack you in any way. Fram (talk) 14:17, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

DEFAULTSORT
Please start writing the DEFAULTSORT properly. Jerod Lycett (talk) 05:19, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hedvig Sirenia


The article Hedvig Sirenia has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "I am not seeing an notability and everything on the web comes back to this page. There is one page that looks like they may have copy and pasted from, however, the site does not exist anymore. Look at the revolvy link https://www.google.com/search?q=Hedvig+Sirenia&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS909US909&oq=Hedvig+Sirenia&aqs=chrome..69i57&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bakertheacre Chat/What I Baked 22:47, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Category:Remarried royal consorts
Hi, If you don't like a category, the approach is NOT to empty all the contents, but to take it to Cfd. This is a gross breach of all procedure. Not everyone is likely to agree with your personal opinion that it is not defining. Cfd is probably quicker anyway. I will revert all your changes, using rollback if you don't mind. Feel free to take it to Cfd. Johnbod (talk) 15:59, 25 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello. I just did so because I saw that Surtsicna seemed to say it was not an existing/allowed category: I saw them do the same, and trusted it was correct, so I thought it was not controversial. I realize ny I may have misunderstood Surtsicna. I do agree with Surtsicna about the category being uneccessary, but I would never have let that mattered unless I thought the category was already not aproved and sheduled to be deleted, and I acted hastily. I am deeply saddened, please forgive me. I have no objection with anything anyone else does. I suffer from severe anxiety, which means I can't handle any form of conflicts. I will agree with anyone about anything, as long as this means I will not be involved in any sort of conflict. I will take my hands from this issue completely. I agree with you, I'll agree with anyone, just leave me out of this discussion. I would not have participated in this unless I incorrectly got the impression that is was un-controversial. I appologize for any offense I could have caused. You may do whatever you wish without any protests from me. I will do whater you ask of my as long as my anxiety is not triggered. Please leave my out of this issue, I regret everything, please forgive me. I appologize to you, Surtsicna, to the person creating the category, and to anyone else who might have became angry by my behaviour. Please bann me if you wish, but I can't be involved in conflicts.--Aciram (talk) 16:14, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
 * No worries - categories that are disliked for whatever reason are taken to a WP:Cfd discussion (rather like an Afd) for the wider community to consider. I expect this will turn up there, & of course you are welcome to comment. Johnbod (talk) 16:36, 25 July 2020 (UTC)