User talk:Aciram/Archives/2021/April

Mary Wollstonecraft Award

 * Thank you very much! I mainly write about women of history - from many professions, writers being one - and it is nice when it's noticed. I accept the award with pride! --Aciram (talk) 16:40, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Spelling
Thank you for your recent edits to Female education, Petra Lie, and Madeleine-Françoise Calais. Please be aware that the correct spelling is "successful", not "succesful". Jellysandwich0 (talk) 14:52, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you--Aciram (talk) 15:19, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Red link categories
Hello, Aciram,

Please do not add nonexistent, red link categories to articles or category pages unless you plan on creating the categories yourself very soon. See WP:REDNO for details. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you--Aciram (talk) 23:44, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Could You Explain Yourself?
You unilaterally performed this action and gave no reason as to why you removed an entrance with more than one source discussing their involvement with the occult in your edit summary. Do you mind explaining yourself? Celestina007 (talk) 13:58, 18 April 2021 (UTC)


 * I now see it was made in 2020. I'm afraid I don't remember it. I am very active here, and I don't remember all of my edits. Perhaps it was made by mistake, but I simply can't recall, I am sorry. My suggestion to you, is to simply put it back. I won't protest or revert it, or cause any problem for you, so there is no need for a discussion: if I have done wrong, it must be by mistake, I appologize, and I will not do it again. I suffer from anxiety, which means that I will imediately lay flat in front of anyone as soon as there is something which can turn in to a conflict. Please do whatever you wish and I will not contest it. Please. My anxiety will not permit me to engage in conflicts. I am very sorry if I have caused offense in any way and I appologize if that is the case, but my main principle must be to avoid conflicts. --Aciram (talk) 14:11, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Calming down, I now realize what must have hapened then, and I know actually do have an explantion. Adolf Hitler has repeatedly been placed in two lists in the article: both the 19th-century list, and in the 20th-century list. Of course, he was indeed born in 1889, but he was only eleven when the 19th-century ended, and thus he belongs to the 20th-century rather than the 19th-century. This list clearly state that people should be listed in the century they were active in, which is of course the most usefull method. But people often make the mistake of just looking at when the person was born, and place them in that list or category, even if the person was born in 1899. I have often corrected time period errors such as those, and this must have been one of those examples. Thinking back, I seem to vagely remember, that because of this very reason mentioned above, Adolf Hitler has been constantly place in two lists in this article, and then correctly removed from the 19th-century list, which has given the impression that he has been deleted entirely. This is the explanation I can think of. I do hope the problem can be solved, and people stop placing him in the 19th-century list over and over again, and just let him be in the 20th-century list.--Aciram (talk) 20:05, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Legal occupation
Honestly, I am puzzled by this, and this, and this. It seems pretty obvious to me (and to ) that Category:Historical legal occupations isn't for occupations that are not illegal, but for occupations in the legal area. Drmies (talk) 12:22, 27 April 2021 (UTC)