User talk:Aciram/Archives/2023/April

Template usage
Hi,

I have noticed that you used the Template:Expand Swedish in Mary Johnston Rose. It is used for articles that can be expanded with text from a better article in Swedish. The article in Swedish is, well, the same, therefore the template is not needed. I removed it and made some minor changes (apparently you are the author of both en.wiki and sv.wiki article—I did not see that before, so in my edit summary I assumed that the article was translated).

So for your notice, if you are writing an article both in English and in Swedish, the template is not necessary.

Have a nice day! PRmaster1 (talk) 17:08, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, I know. The Swedish version has more text and information than the English one has, and are thus better. I know, I wrote both.--Aciram (talk) 17:10, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi,
 * I saw that you reverted my edit. I understand the template issue, although I think that language templates are supposed to link to versions that are sufficiently better written and referenced, not just have more text. I don't think you should remove more citations needed however, as the article has significant portions of text unsourced. PRmaster1 (talk) 17:42, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The Swedish version has more information. You can move back the reference template, I did not notice I removed it, I just intended to revert your removal of the language template. --Aciram (talk) 17:44, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Alright, if you insist on the expand language template staying, I will not replace it.
 * Best regards, PRmaster1 (talk) 17:50, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Marcelle Dauphin


A tag has been placed on Marcelle Dauphin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. EnormityOP (talk) 04:18, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Marcelle Dauphin
Hi. I've moved your article to draft space because it's not ready for mainspace. Please work on improving it and then submit for review. Please don't move it yourself. Deb (talk) 08:14, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Odd, there are many stub articles in Wikipedia. An article is after all never ready, every reader that comes accross it, can continue edit it for eternity while it is published and can be read at the same time; and is a very good wikipedia policy to not demand an article be perfect and finnished before it is published. Had that been the case, few articles would have been made to begin with. It seems odd for someone else to delete my article and then post it as their own, rather than to just edit the article I started ,and give me credit for my intiaitive to start it, just as I myself often edit and develop articles started by others. Now, that article might remain a draft for sixteen years, or forewever - rather than to be continually edited, and grow, with every editor that comes across it, had it remained published. But, it is not a big concern for me. Have a nice day.--Aciram (talk) 09:23, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
 * If you care about it, just work on it. It won't stay there forever, because drafts are deleted after six months unless they are capable of passing review. Deb (talk) 17:50, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Gertraut Munk
Here you are. Deb (talk) 14:46, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Incomplete citations
Your addition to doesn't give sufficient info to find the source. An anon was removing it as unable to find the source. Please remedy? Thanks Adakiko (talk) 11:47, 16 April 2023 (UTC)