User talk:Aciram/Archives/2023/January

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:16th-century Haitian people


A tag has been placed on Category:16th-century Haitian people indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:12, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Withing
Hello! Just a note to say that I've noticed this word (withing) that you've used on a few pages you have created. Bulgarian National Women's Union Democratic Association of Hungarian Women Union of Antifascist Women of Romania It's not a word I know and I can't find it in a dictionary. I'd be interested to know what it means! If possible could you rephrase without that word to make it easier to read. Thank you! Wishing a happy and successful new year ☺️ Dontgiveupthedayjob (talk) 13:07, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I had no idea I left that word somewhere and if I did, I'm sure its some sort of typo. I am not a native English speaker. If you see a type somewhere in wikipedia its easy to correct. Have a nice day. --Aciram (talk) 13:09, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Aciram!


Happy New Year! Aciram, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

— Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 04:09, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 04:09, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much, and happy new year Moops!--Aciram (talk) 04:11, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Impressed!
I am new-ish editor of Wikipedia; I have completed 150 or so edits and written 2 articles for English Wikipedia and a smaller number of edits and just 1 article for Spanish Wikipedia. I was browsing the "awards" for the number of edits and, somehow, I ran into your User page and saw your Master Editor II credential...very impressive!

Just thought of saying hi and congrats for your contributions to this wonderful source of knowledge! Well done! Escuadro (talk) 00:34, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much, that was nice of you to say. To work here is relaxing to me. --Aciram (talk) 00:39, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, I coincide with you, it is a great investment of time. Cheers! :) Escuadro (talk) 00:43, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Ulrika Eleonora Stålhammar
Hello Aciram, I just noticed that you undid my edit on Ulrika Eleonora Stålhammar because you found no redundancy. However, the sentence before runs: "Stålhammar was charged with ... marrying a member of the same sex." Isn't that the same as: "Stålhammar was also charged for having married a member of the same sex." Honestly said, I don't understand why this shall NOT be redundant. Would you please explain this to me - or rechange it? Thanks in advance. Chattus (talk) 23:15, 9 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Honestly, I don't understand HOW this could be considered redundant? How can you possibly find it redundant to know the charges of the trial, when the trial take such a prominent place in the article? Aside from having put on trial for being a soldier and dressing in male clothing, Stålhammar was charged with the crime of having married a person of her own sex. This was forbidden by law at the time, and carried a death penalty. She managed to avoid death penalty for marrying a woman by her claim that the marriage was sexually unconsumated. How could this serious criminal charge, which was one reason to why she was put on trial, possibly be considered redundant? Can you explain this to me? --Aciram (talk) 23:34, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
 * The matter is extremely important, but, as I indicated, it is mentioned twice, in 2 successive sentences, nearly literally identical. Please, have a look at the last part of the last sentence in the previous paragraph, directly above. I think you must have overlooked this. Chattus (talk) 18:04, 10 January 2023 (UTC)