User talk:Acm2000

Image tagging for Image:Borats.Television.Programme-s01e01-(000511)16-39-24-.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Borats.Television.Programme-s01e01-(000511)16-39-24-.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 17:05, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

apology
Sorry about tagging ipswich ripper for deletion - I've been battling a bunch of *real* nonsense, and thought yours was another. I've since googled it, and see that yours is a legit topic. Aleta 19:44, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

However I've tagged it for deletion as the term "Ipswich Ripper" seems not to be used by anyone except one single newspaper. The sources you added (Mail, Sun, Yahoo and Times) use either "Ripper" alone or "East Anglia Ripper" (in the case of The Times). If this does turn out to be a serial killer he or she may never be known as the Ipswich Ripper; Peter Sutcliffe is not known as the Leeds Ripper, for example. If you'd like to comment, you're welcome to do so either on the article's talk page or here. Regards, Tonywalton | Talk 20:41, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * One thought - this seems more suitable for a news service than an encyclopædia, as yet. Have you considered putting it on Wikinews instead (it would need to follow their rules on titles) as it doesn't appear to be there? Tonywalton | Talk 21:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)