User talk:Acnandi

October 2018
Hello, I'm ARMcgrath. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. A.R.M. 03:21, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!


Hello, Acnandi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 05:44, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
 * Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * The Signpost, our newspaper.

My apology
Hi Acnandi, I apologize for this mess I created. I misunderstood the nature of the sources and believed them to be wp:reliable sources (RS). Now I see the sources are in fact, blogs. Blogs being wp:selfpublished are not generally acceptable sources. In this case, I don't see them as being RS. I left a note on talk:Anukulchandra Chakravarty that I withdrew any objection and now argue for that content to be removed. I all too often see the edit summary "Removed wrong information". Often what the person means is "I don't like it". Again, my apology. If you this issues again, please leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for being persistent! Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:43, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Please format / indent your talk
It helps one follow conversational threads. See help:talk pages Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 19:26, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Citations and reliable sources
Wikipedia has a policy of wp:verifiability, any significant content must wp:cite a wp:reliable source (RS). See help:referencing for beginners. Note that self-published sources, blogs, wikis (including this Wikipedia) are generally (but not always) not considered RS. Content should be under editorial oversight and the website should be very concerned about their reputation for accuracy. Example Times of India, The Guardian, etc. wp:primary sources may be self-serving and censor content they wish to not be seen. Content should be warts and all. If Anukulchandra Chakravarty is cited in numerous RS that he was a "Self proclaimed Godman", then that probably should be in the article. Not saying he was, but that should be a Wikipedia editor's impartial position. See wp:Purpose which is a good read. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 19:26, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

NPOV
I left a comment on talk:Anukulchandra Chakravarty I am not sure if either "side" is attempting to edit the article to wp:NPOV. I'm no longer going to comment/work on this. Best of luck. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 21:23, 22 October 2018 (UTC)