User talk:Acom

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Colours (Ixion/Orcus)
Hi, I’ve noticed you added a couple of images to plutinos' infoboxes. Such header images (compare with a few Main belt asteroids boxes) usually state clearly what they are (e.g. an actual picture for a lucky few, an artist’s vision, a computer plot generated with the given data set etc). Could you please add a short comment like this to 28978 Ixion & 90482 Orcus (and Sedna)? (on the image page).

The colours are an important differentiator among these objects. There’s more than one way to express them (including the albedo). In addition, the colour/albedo data for some of them are limited and a stream of new observations is making the images obsolete. (This happened to some of my images in just a couple of months!) I’ve been contributing for a while now to the physical characteristics, including colours (see the related articles or my page for a few examples). I’m concerned that unless we align among all contributors the data we’re using and the way we use them we are risking creating confusion by presenting the same objects with very different hues, much too dim or bright compared to others etc. I believe the images you’ve added are fine; such images add some identity to otherwise difficult to distinguish objects and add some 'life' to otherwise austere articles. I’d be interested to know what data do did you use (colour indices? Slope? Albedo?) and how did you render them. Thank you. Eurocommuter 08:15, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

TNO satellite articles
Hello. I see you've been creating individual articles for some TNO satellites. Although it is true that every natural satellite should have an article, I wouldn't create articles for TNO satellites yet because we still know next to nothing about them. For example, the satellite of needs to be confirmed first.

PS. Please don't clear your talk page, see talk page guidelines.

--Jyril 07:59, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Discuss...
Hi. Recently you created a separated article for when some while ago we'd decided that until much more was known about it there wasn't much point. All you'd done was removed one section from the main article and pasted it, so I put it back and restored the redirect. Now I see you reverted that, without using an edit summary, or mentioning it on the talk page. This is not very helpful, and I hope you'll discuss this on the talk page if you want to argue that there should be a moon article separate from the main article. If you don't discuss things when you disagree you'll find you generate far more friction than necessary. Also, as Jyril said, blanking your talk page is considered bad form. Worldtraveller 10:38, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:032906eclipse.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:032906eclipse.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:31, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Proposed Deletion
I've added the "prod" template to the article, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:. If you remove the dated prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

ThreeBlindMice 02:49, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Orbit_Nemsis.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Orbit_Nemsis.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:49, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Asteroid Renderings
Many of them are very nice convex hull renderings. Those that are good provide a nice sense of the object. Those that were of poor quality I removed, as they did not provide a sense of the object. Thank you for the additions. It's a great start to what appears to be an ambitious project. Abyssoft 07:58, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

I just came from Image:11A.jpg and figured I should suggest that you add a bit more information about what this image is and where it's from. If I hadn't noticed its addition and removal from 11 Parthenope I'd have had no idea what to make of it. I notice that the rest of your recent uploads are also missing information on their respective description pages. And once they've been sourced and described, perhaps you might be interested uploading them to Wikimedia Commons as well so other languages can use them? Bryan Derksen 20:11, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Commons cannot accept copyrighted images.--JyriL talk 20:27, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Asteroid shape models
I notice you've added those nice asteroid shape models from the publications of Mikko Kaasalainen's group into the asteroid articles. They are a significant enhancement! However, I also notice that they have the GFDL-self made copyright tag on them, as in "I, the creator of this work, hereby blah blah blah ....". So, just in a friendly way, I'm wondering are you the creator of those images − as in, e.g. a member of M. Kaasalainen's research group? If not, the copyright tags should be changed. (At the least because those astronomers might be a bit upset to see their research described as someone else's work.) For example you can probably get their permission to upload them, etc.

Don't worry, I'm not going to go and tag them as copyright suspect, because I find the copyright "correctness" on Wikipedia a major annoyance more than anything else, but I also suspect that without a change, some stickler for correctness is going to find them soon and they'll get tagged for deletion. Deuar 14:22, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't care about correctness itself, but copyright issues can be damaging to Wikipedia, so the annoyance is justified. Using GNU template for images is not acceptable since you haven't created the images and the authors own the copyright. Maybe we could use these images under fair use. There was a database which included all these models, but I have been unable to locate it anymore. If we had the data, we could recreate new, better images and replace the current ones.--JyriL talk 20:25, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Dalampasigan Beach Resort, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DMacks 04:12, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Beachwood Resort-Hotel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DMacks 04:13, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Villia del Prado Resort, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DMacks 04:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:2AS.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:2AS.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eleassar my talk 11:57, 25 April 2007 (UTC) On your behalf, I have commented on the image in question. I remember when you created and placed them. Abyssoft 23:00, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Could you please explain how you created the image? This would help a lot here. Please, leave your comment at Possibly unfree images. --Eleassar my talk 12:47, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

I have also listed the following images as possibly unfree: Image:37A.jpg, Image:35A.jpg, Image:15A.jpg, Image:14A.jpg, Image:12A.jpg, Image:11A.jpg, Image:10A.jpg, Image:9AS2.jpg, Image:8AS.jpg, Image:7AS.jpg, Image:6AS.jpg, Image:5AS.jpg. You are welcome to leave your comment at Possibly unfree images/2007 September 6. --Eleassar my talk 09:03, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Your Pictures
It has come to the attention of some Wikipedians that many of your images are being flagged for cleanup/deletion. This is for several reasons, which I will outline now:

Firstly many of your images consist of a small image in the center surrounded by a border with some wordart text. This is not accepted image policy. They should have only the center image.

Secondly, all of your photographs are of terrible resolution. These images are not of much use in this state, as not much can be seen of them.

Thirdly, the copyright of many of your images is questionable. Did you take the photos yourself? If you got them from a search engine like Google the image is probably copyrighted, no matter how much you have edited them. It was not right to put the "I, the creator..." template on if you did not create the photograph. The only exception would be if you got the image from the NASA site, because this is a branch of the US government. Please contact me and tell me if you did take the photo using your own telescope and if you are a professional astronomer. If so your help could probably be used with many articles. Another user, User:SteveBaker is possibly willing to adopt you and help you learn about image uploading, as he is a graphics worker and has many helpful tips. Again, please contact me on my talk page User talk:Smiley200 so we can resolve this without losing images of so many star systems. Thanks, Smiley200 18:55, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Philippine Nebula
I have nominated Philippine Nebula for deletion. This appears to be a random cloud of gas that was named at an internet discussion board. The article contains no information that looks useful. You are welcome to comment.

Also note that I agree with one of the other commentators about your images, and I will proceed to nominate some of these images for deletion pending the outcomes of the discussion on Philippine Nebula and other articles. Dr. Submillimeter 14:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:NGC2264 Name.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:NGC2264 Name.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dr. Submillimeter 09:04, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:NGC2264.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:NGC2264.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dr. Submillimeter 09:13, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Snowflakecluster.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Snowflakecluster.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sakurambo 桜ん坊  15:23, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Form-PRG.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Form-PRG.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dr. Submillimeter 11:06, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:TPRG1137.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:TPRG1137.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dr. Submillimeter 11:07, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Your Images
Could you please stop creating images with this word art? You may think it looks cool and new, but everyone else thinks it looks stupid, unrefined, and silly. In fact, don't even label pictures because that's what captions are for. I also warn you that if you are finding these images just willy nilly off the internet, it is illegal to upload them unless they are by the US Government, meaning NASA.

Oh, and I think you used Microsoft Paint to create some images on Polar-ring galaxy; don't do this either. Sean MD80 talk 11:47, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree, and I have noticed this for a long time. There should be something done. TheOtherSiguy 18:38, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:3AS.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:3AS.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sakurambo 桜ん坊  23:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Copy_of_Sedna.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Copy_of_Sedna.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:49, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Offer of Help.
It is clear that you (User:Acom) are an enthusiastic contributor to Wikipedia - but it's evident from the slew of your contributions that are about to be deleted that you really need some help and guidance to direct those energies in a useful way.

Wikipedia has an informal system called "Adopt-a-User" in which experienced users help less experienced people to improve their Wiki skills. You could either go to the 'adoption' site and look for someone with similar interests to you - or if you like, I'd be happy to help you out. I'm a professional computer graphics person (I used to design flight simulator graphics - and now I'm a computer games graphics guy) - I can give you lots of advice about how to dramatically improve the kinds of images and diagrams that you've been contributing.

Please leave a note on my User_talk:SteveBaker page if you'd like me to help out...or alternatively, find someone else on the Adopt-A-User page who can help.

You are clearly an enthusiastic contributor and we don't want to lose that energy!

SteveBaker 00:47, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Xmascluster.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Xmascluster.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dr. Submillimeter 11:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Image-PGR.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Image-PGR.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dr. Submillimeter 11:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Compare neb map2.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Compare neb map2.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dr. Submillimeter 11:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Location NGC2264 2.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Location NGC2264 2.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dr. Submillimeter 11:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Philippine Nebula2.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Philippine Nebula2.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dr. Submillimeter 11:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:El61moonsifo.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:El61moonsifo.gif, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dr. Submillimeter 08:24, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:NeptuneMoonsinfo.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:NeptuneMoonsinfo.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dr. Submillimeter 08:24, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Deep Braille.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:Deep Braille.jpg, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 70.55.86.83 15:17, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:10A.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:10A.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:53, 6 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Siebrand 20:53, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:VSE 2013.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:VSE 2013.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dread Pirate Westley• Aargh 02:26, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Images listed for deletion
Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Images and media for deletion if you are interested in preserving them. Thank you. Dread Pirate Westley• Aargh 16:55, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:2003EL61moon1.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:2003EL61moon1.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 132.205.44.5 21:43, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:2003EL61moon2.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:2003EL61moon2.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 132.205.44.5 21:43, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

File:2003EL61 System.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:2003EL61 System.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:12, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

File:2003EL61.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:2003EL61.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:12, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Halimede.jpg
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Halimede.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Halimede.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Halimede.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:File:Halimede.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:File:Halimede.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:File:Halimede.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Masur (talk) 00:45, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Rbit-2867.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rbit-2867.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 09:06, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Rbit21.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rbit21.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 09:06, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:JEO at Europa.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:JEO at Europa.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:01, 4 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ChiZeroOne (talk) 18:01, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Ros-21.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ros-21.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 21:39, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Deep Braille.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Deep Braille.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 08:02, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Cererian movie052706.gif listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cererian movie052706.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 16:10, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Ixion 043006.jpg


The file File:Ixion 043006.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, no foreseeable encyclopedic use."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:35, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Chocolate Hills Monument.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Chocolate Hills Monument.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. --TheImaCow (talk) 15:38, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Orcus 043006.jpg


The file File:Orcus 043006.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused low quality image, unlikely own work"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 15:38, 29 January 2024 (UTC)