User talk:Acordia

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! andy (talk) 11:22, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion of Programme of Demands (PoD)
A tag has been placed on Programme of Demands (PoD) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. andy (talk) 11:22, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

I see that the titel page has a wrong title: It should be "Program of demands". I have tried to use other words that I have used in my book and on my website (http://www.productrealisatie.nl/indexGB.html I used the book as a reference to note that first these theories have a relation and second that you can have a preview at Google Book search. If you have noted that somebody else is using my words that that is the intruder. Then I would like to know where you have found that. The same happens with my other contributions like page on Time to market, Innovation management and Design for Six Sigma. What did I do wrong?


 * Please check WP:COI: you have a clear conflict of interest when you are adding links to your own book in different articles. People should not create articles about things they have a strong connection with, or add links to their own work, company, ... Wikipedia must be neutral and objective, and it is hard for people tojudge their own work in such a way. Fram (talk) 13:24, 16 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I also notice that your book is self-published, which makes it even less certain that it is an acceptable WP:RS. Anyway, I have now redirected one article you created to the other with the correct title, so that our attention can be focused on that one. Fram (talk) 13:28, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

I can understand your concern. However this book was published before with Publisher Boom in the Netherlands. They did not reprint it because of a take over. I agreed with them I could add a revised edition to Google Book Search under my own name. Also Google is very reluctant to take books certainly when a publisher claims the same ISDN for the older edition. I had to convince Google with the emails of the publishers and leave all ISBN-numbers out. The other thing is that you want to have in-depth info on certain subjects. I am a Professor at the Rotterdam University for Applied Science. It would be odd to write about things you do not have a strong connection with. Obviously in science you should refer to the books you are using in your articles. I am more affiliated to the subjects in my own publications also because I am the first that has published about innovation management in relation to quality, time to market and Design for Six Sigma. It would be strange I could not use that to update the Wiki Project?


 * Google books is, as far as I can tell, not reluctant at all to take any books, even self-published ones. They may of course be reluctant to add an Englishlanguage book by an unknown publisher when the ISBN adde to it indicates that it should be a book published by Boom(since each ISBN has part of the code reserved for a certain publisher).
 * But anyway, there is a huge difference between writing about what you are knowledgeable about, and writing about your own new concepts or linking to your own book. If your knowledge is based upon the work of other people, use references to their work, not your own. If your work is new research or a new concept, wait for other people to notice it and to write about it. Otherwise, the line between sharing knowledge and self-promotion becomes blurred and that's not something we encourage (I notice that you have been reverted on Time management by three different editors so far, so I'm not alone with this idea). Fram (talk) 16:00, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Google Book Search is not a publisher but a search engine that searches and displays book contents. It seams a contradiction when other people refer to my site or my book that it would be plagiarism. Because that was the judgment on the other contributions of described subjects. My contributions to 'time to market' were the following:

Usually innovations make it possible to improve performances and functionality for lower cost prices. The market prices will follow the decrease of cost prices when the competition becomes more severe. This is the reason that the first companies introducing the innovation in the market will earn more than the followers.

In the end a fast TTM is important for all, because the most advanced technology can be used for the development of an innovation for the fulfillment of the most recent market demands. A short TTM will increase profits for successful market introductions. ~ Many such tools and techniques are available such as concurrent engineering and multidisciplinary involvement.

Does not seem logic to me that this would be offensive to the other texts. To add the subject 'costs' to this page enriches the page. This counts also for my contribution to Innovation management for what skills an innovation manager should have: Most Innovation Managers are called Project Managers. Innovation projects however, differ from other projects because at the start the result of the project is not certain. Most projects for example in construction have at the start a clear quality specification of the result and should be realized within budget and time. The quality parameter in innovation projects must be defined during the process itself. An innovation manager must therefore put more effort to balance the project parameters time, budget and quality (+ information and organization). This requires more entrepreneurial skills from an innovation manager

These contributions are not appreciated?


 * Not when you forget to mention the rather crucial element that after the line "A short TTM will increase profits for successful market introductions.", you added a link to your own book as the reference for this statement. This certainly gives the impression that your contributions have the basic intent of promoting your book or yourself. Literally all your article contributions have included a link to your own book. 11:50, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

February 2009
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam); and,
 * 4) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. MrOllie (talk) 19:54, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Program of demands
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Program of demands, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Spamming of book by author

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram (talk) 13:16, 13 March 2009 (UTC)