User talk:Acralux

Revert warring
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GliderMaven (talk) 18:11, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Your edits to Gun laws in Switzerland
Your most recent edit tried to define the legislation simply as 'liberal'. Unfortunately that's not a definition. Liberal, while in some cases can be defined in absolute terms this doesn't seem to be one of them. For example you can't buy fully automatic weaponry in Switzerland, so is it really definitively liberal? I really don't think so. It's not a definition, and even if it was, it's not the right definition. In practice, 'liberal' is considered as a comparative position, more liberal than somewhere else. Given that your subject line implied that you apparently thought you were removing all comparisons, your edits are causing me some concerns.GliderMaven (talk) 23:03, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

You probably need to understand that the purposes of the first few sentences is simply to define the topic of the article. In this case it is the legislation that relates to guns in Switzerland. As such, there should be no mention of liberal, America or any other countries. You can do that later in other paragraphs, particularly if it summarises or matches the text of the rest of the article. But not right there.GliderMaven (talk) 23:03, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Also, it would be a good idea if you please discussed the material of the article on the talk page prior to making further changes.GliderMaven (talk) 23:03, 18 February 2018 (UTC)