User talk:Acre8tor

October 2011
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Stephen D. Leonard with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Sp33dyphil © • © 06:47, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

There is an issue with resources. I am deleting it entirely to re create it step by step in accordance to wiki rules. Acre8tor (talk) 06:50, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove all content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Stephen D. Leonard. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Sp33dyphil © • © 06:51, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

It does not comply with wiki rules. I created it can I not delete and reedit?? Acre8tor (talk) 06:53, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Stephen D. Leonard, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Rxlxm (talk) 07:02, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Before you block me for editing a page that I created and is a work in progress, please allow me the room to adhere to wiki policy. the one who created this article has to or should be able to edit / reedit and cite resources accordingly. I respectfully request edit room to erase and recreate the article in accordance to wiki policy. Acre8tor (talk) 07:09, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The AfD process runs for one week. You are welcome to work on the article in the mean time, writing new and better content and adding references to resolve the problems that have been noted. However, the fact that there is an AfD in progress is still a fact regardless, so you are not permitted to try to hide that fact (or others' indicators that there are problems yet to be addressed). You may wish to use a sandbox in your userspace (User:Acre8tor/Stephen D. Leonard perhaps) if you wish to work on a whole rewrite from scratch, then you can say "here is the improved one!" so it can be compared to see if it resolves the problems. However, the nature of the AfD in this case appears to be that the subject itself is beyond hope at this time (not just that some or much of the writing about it is not viable), so there's no use in blanking the existing page's content--may as well just add whatever's needed right there. DMacks (talk) 07:12, 17 October 2011 (UTC).

Even if you delete the tag, all changes are recorded in the revision history, so you can't hide it even if you repeatedly blank or remove the AFD Template. AFD template is also clear: "Feel free to edit the article, but the article must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed. For more information, particularly on merging or moving the article during the discussion." Rxlxm (talk) 07:16, 17 October 2011 (UTC)