User talk:Acrmed

AfC notification: Draft:Besnik Sulaj has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Besnik Sulaj. Thanks!  scope_creep Talk  10:52, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Hello Acrmed. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Draft:Besnik Sulaj, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Acrmed. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.  scope_creep Talk  10:53, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

February 2020
This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Alketa Vejsiu, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Kuru  (talk)  23:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Laerta


The article Laerta has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Promotional stub on child model. The references show that the subject has been publicized by her parents and other agents, but no significant coverage by independent reliable sources."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:06, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Laerta


The article Laerta has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Per Robert McClenon - 'Promotional stub on child model. The references show that the subject has been publicized by her parents and other agents, but no significant coverage by independent reliable sources.'"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  LJF2019    talk   08:45, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Laerta for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laerta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Laerta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  LJF2019    talk   11:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)