User talk:Actio

Hello, Actio, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
 * Be Bold!
 * Meet other new users
 * Learn from others
 * Play nicely with others
 * Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
 * Tell us about you

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Luksuh 05:41, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Jay Mundy
Re your comments on talk - it would be best to register your vote here: Articles for deletion/Jay Mundy so that it is tallied. Best, Sylvain1972 (talk) 14:23, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Note on Yeshiva article and request for guidance
Please correct me if this is not the proper use of a user talk page.

I just wanted to mention that I added a comment after your comment on "Yeshiva", explaining the difference between the American usage of the term and the historical / international one, which is used by the article (not mine). I think this has caused quite a bit of misunderstanding on that page--84.229.51.101 (talk) 10:06, 8 January 2010 (UTC).

March 2010
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you.  freshacconci  talk talk  11:06, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

April 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Icarus of old (talk)

on the contrary, a vandal is repeatedly posting wrong information and information from a source that dishonestly claims Rosler to be a faculty member. Previously it was also listed that Rosler was born i Canada, leading to several public announcements to that effect. Threats are not appreciated. Why not go after the vandal? Actio (talk) 02:35, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|25px]] Next time you remove referenced material from this article you will be blocked from editing. The choice is yours. Moriori (talk) 02:46, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

i just saw this, and although I am not going to go back and look at the article at present, I am not surprised that people don't want to work on improving wikipedia when correcting false information leads to really crude threats posed in the most impolite possible manner and without explanation. Just because something is 'referenced' DOES NOT mean it is correct. Obviously. The fact that the page I was correcting was repeatedly vandalized clearly means nothing to "Moriori" (who rather than answering my question simply added the grotesque phrase 'the choice is yours,' to the threat. Actio (talk) 17:49, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Cindy Sherman
You are free to fix the Sherman article substantively. Your problem appears to be that you do not follow appropriate MOS, BLP, etc. If you follow the reading material suggested in the welcome message at the top of the page, especially Learn from others, Play nicely with others and Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!, you should be OK. Feel free to contact me if you have any edits you are not sure about, and I will advise as best I can. Quis separabit? 21:19, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jerzy Popiełuszko, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Williamsburg and Greenpoint. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

May 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=721072742 your edit] to Prignitz may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:50, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Landkreis Prignitz.pdf|Changes in Population since 1875 within the Current Boundaries Blue Line: Population; Dotted Line: Comparison to Population Changes of Brandenburg state; Grey

Family of Man
Actio, yes I would not nominate this article as of high quality...it's a huge topic that requires many more contributors putting in. It is good to see your interest and to have your amendment, but your immoderate language is unpleasant...keep your hat on! I'm sure you have constructive and learned input to bring the The Family of Man article up to a standard of which you approve. It would be very welcome. I'll own up, my signature was not appearing on comments in talk pages for a while due to some malfunction...I have been kindly helped by some generous editors to sort that. Best wishes Jamesmcardle(talk) 08:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

so what's the solution? The subject is of great interest to photography history, and i am not aware of immoderate language. Sorry. Tagging one writer, and an eminent one at that, with a political slant is not a good approach, imo. and suggests a tentative hold on the lineup of writers and commentators on this landmark exhibition and on the field in general. cheers. Actio (talk) 07:48, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Our article about John Fund
Thanks for your recent comment at talk:John Fund. I've taken the liberty of moving it to a new section at the bottom of that page in the hope of making it more noticeable and getting some responses. Please feel free to revert that edit if you don't like what I did, or to choose a better name for that section than "July 2018".

I may well end up suggesting we run a discussion about deleting the article, but I'll wait a few days before making any response, to give other people a chance to respond to all the points you made. Cheers, CWC 01:11, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for your contributions to Z Communications

Per: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Z_Communications&action=history Metro2fsb (talk) 06:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)