User talk:ActuallyAndrewGarfield

November 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:Some1234567890&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Some1234567890. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  14:21, 27 November 2021 (UTC)}}

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:ActuallyNCT127&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/ActuallyNCT127. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:40, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
 * User:GeneralNotability For what it's worth, it appears that this account is a promotional account created for a video by GQ's Youtube channel (see ) on behalf of the real Andrew Garfield, which means that it's technically not a violation of UPOL. Muslim789 appears to have known about this video and hence made that comment with the mistaken belief that famous actors' accounts are "immune" to blocking. This account has never made any edits and is unlikely to ever be active again even if it were unblocked and thus no additional action is required. Just thought to make a note here for posterity's sake. Axem Titanium (talk) 22:19, 12 January 2022 (UTC)