User talk:Acw5507/sandbox

Shengchieh Lee's Peer review
The article you choose to revise looks overall concisely, but it still can improve on more details on the provided link instead of just posting a hyperlink without any introductions, and I think this will be your main focus on this revision. The article got a clear structure and neutral tone for each topic, so it cut off many details that readers may interested in; however, the author does not balance the length of each art well, in the example, the see also seems very perfunctory by those few hyperlinks, so it would be better to briefly introduce or delete this part and then stretch out from other parts. The citation of this article looks good which are all reliable sources from professional websites. Your sandbox is blank, so I cannot give out constructive advice for your revision, but this article looks not hard to do the improvement.