User talk:Ad.minster

Welcome!



 * Thank you! That is very kind, and I do love chocolate chips!  Yumm.  Ad.minster (talk) 19:35, 3 October 2008 (UTC)


 * You're quite welcome. Make sure to use the links too, they're the meal for which the cookies are the dessert for. &mdash;Elipongo (Talk contribs) 21:55, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Civility
Hello,

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username,...


 * My first barnstar! Thank you!!  Ad.minster (talk) 16:30, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations!

 * Why thank you! Wow again.  Ad.minster (talk) 02:33, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Please move on
I'm doing you a favour and helping you move on with that incident that seems to stick in your mind by deleting the relevant material. Let's just remember we're all here to build an encyclopedia. best regards, – xeno  ( talk ) 03:43, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * What are you talking about? Ad.minster (talk) 03:45, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The difficult people bit. – xeno  ( talk ) 03:47, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Are you referring to someone in particular? Ad.minster (talk) 03:51, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * eh, if you don't remember, neither do I. I'm off for the evening. cheers, – xeno  ( talk ) 03:56, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, if you had been talking about anyone in particular, I would have told you to keep an eye on him. Anyone who makes so much trouble for so many excellent Wikipedians couldn't be an asset.  Fortunately, you weren't talking about anyone or anything.  I think another barnstar is in order, don't you?  Cheers, Ad.minster (talk) 04:08, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * If you can put it behind you than you never know. but please make a concerted effort to do so. – xeno  ( talk ) 12:46, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Tb's deletion of articles
Can somebody get Tb to move on?

He is still following me all over Wikipedia, reverting everything I do and making trouble whenever he pleases.

Here is and example of the WP:Hounding, of a link to a list, made by User:Tb of articles that he has deleted in the past by way of redirects and other means and which, since he has carefully listed them out, he plans to delete again:. Fortunately, Tb provides all the evidence himself of what is known as WP:Hounding, whereby a user follows an editor(s) around and reverts everything they did. It is also called disruption, and indeed Tb's sole purpose here on Wikipedia seems to be that.

I wish he would move on and leave me alone. Ad.minster (talk) 11:06, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * there have been no rulings against him interacting with you. rdunn  PLIB  12:34, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

April 2009
You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

Reformed Episcopal seminary articles
Hi, Ad.minster! I'd like to ask for your input about the R.E. seminary articles. I merged them into the REC article in February, but I see you've recreated them. I've started a discussion about the issue at Talk:Reformed Episcopal Church. Chonak (talk) 18:56, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
لenna vecia  05:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ETS-seal.png
Thanks for uploading File:ETS-seal.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

"Local churches" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Local churches and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 13 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 01:09, 13 January 2022 (UTC)