User talk:Ad van der Ven

Welcome!


Hello, Ad van der Ven, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
 * Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Sadads (talk) 14:46, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

WP:COI
You will also need to follow this best Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 18:36, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Medical content sources
Please choose a peer-reviewed general review or, better yet, a systematic review in a high-quality journal to support edits you make. See WP:MEDREV. --Zefr (talk) 14:04, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Attention Concentration Test) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Attention Concentration Test.

User:QueerEcofeminist while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

 QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 11:12, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Dementia. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. ''You are over-interpreting the cognitive test. It is not used in dementia assessment. Please avoid WP:SYNTH and follow the medical guide for sources at WP:MEDRS. '' Zefr (talk) 15:49, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Second retardation theory (September 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Mirror Cracked was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Second retardation theory and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Second retardation theory, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Second_retardation_theory Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:The_Mirror_Cracked&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Second_retardation_theory reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Mirror Cracked (talk) 22:08, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Second retardation theory concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Second retardation theory, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Second retardation theory


Hello, Ad van der Ven. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Second retardation theory".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 14:24, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Hardy distribution


The page Draft:Hardy distribution has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025557200005052. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review. — Diannaa (talk) 12:53, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hardy distribtion


The article Hardy distribtion has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not a significant concept, only promoted by one author: A. H. G. S. van der Ven."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mvqr (talk) 14:59, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I have no comment on the proposed deletion, but I have corrected the spelling of the article title. It is now at Hardy distribution. Lady  of  Shalott  15:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Ad van der Ven. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Hardy distribtion, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Also Attentional Concentration Test. Mvqr  (talk) 15:02, 22 June 2023 (UTC)