User talk:AdaNelson

January 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of diamond mines has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:11, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of diamond mines was changed by AdaNelson (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.863072 on 2019-01-24T18:11:11+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Avalanche. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:15, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Avalanche was changed by AdaNelson (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.863251 on 2019-01-24T18:15:50+00:00

Speedy deletion nomination of Ada Nelson


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Ada Nelson, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Daiyusha (talk) 18:17, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Scott William Nelson


The article Scott William Nelson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Drmies (talk) 18:17, 1 February 2019 (UTC)


 * AdaNelson, it's clear to me that Dr. Nelson is doing important work: I found this and this in addition to his faculty page. But unless someone has won a Nobel Prize or an Olympic medal or is a head of state, they don't automatically qualify for a page in a general encyclopedia. Imagine if we had pages on every tenured faculty member in every country in the world. So we have a notability standard, which involves either extensive coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject (three videos/films, articles, or book chapters published by companies not affiliated with Iowa State, all about Nelson and his career, would be the minimum) or meeting one of our specialized criteria; the latter is usually easier for academics, since they tend not to get covered much in the media, and here's the one for academics. I'm sorry, but I don't think he merits an encyclopedia article yet; after he makes a spectacular and widely covered discovery, or lands a named professorship at a top-tier university and has highly influential publications ... which may well happen, I am aware. For now, I'm sorry, I don't think I can save the article. Yngvadottir (talk) 18:53, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ada Nelson, you may be blocked from editing. Daiyusha (talk) 18:17, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Scott William Nelson moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Scott William Nelson, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... disco spinster   talk  01:35, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Scott William Nelson


Hello, AdaNelson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Scott William Nelson.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 03:07, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Beachbody
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Beachbody. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 23:34, 11 May 2020 (UTC)