User talk:Adaimon

I noticed some changes concerning Heartstone with the reasoning "Inappropiate and unsourced." and i d like to elaborate on what there is disagreed with.

Edit 1 - putting in "micropayments" instead of "real money"

Progress in HS can be bought for real money, thats true. It would be an useful and more detailed info to change it to "microtransactions" if those were used in the game but micro means a milionth, so the idea is that about a milionth of all the money one has on his account should be deduced from ones account to make a micropayment, referring to the fact that such a payment means next to nothing to the buyer and hence is regularly used for payments like say 2 cents or even 20 cents but tens of euros arent (next to meaningless) micropayments.

Hence using "real money" is more exact than "micropayments".

Edit 2 - deleting "To put together one deck having a chance to be winning at ranked playing takes about 50$ or in-game rewards for 100 days of playing"

To put together a deck having a regular chance to win at ranked playing (where everyone ends up and the playing which matters) takes on average thousands of arcane dust which can be got (almost exclusively) from disenchanting cards while one gets cards through buying them with real money or in-game gold which is got for fulfilling quests providing about 70 gold a day on average, that means 2100 gold a month for which one can buy 21 card packs (those cost 25 euros in real money) while one card pack (if disenchanted) provides about 80 arcane dust on average, meaning one gets about 1680 arcane dust a month which is good enough to get a 1/3 of an average deck useful for ranked playing.

This is an useful info for those who want to know in advance how much time/energy/money the game asks for before they invest some time/energy/money into it and i cant see any reason for deleting that.

Edit 3 - deleting "Know that in order for the game to be widely successful, to everyone could have fun through winning, its made in a way that having better cards and luck is what lets one win in most cases, not making right smart decisions."

If one makes two decks, one containing perfect cards and another one containing just basic cards one gets for free when creating a new account and even if one plays a random card every turn for the deck having the best cards then one will still be way more winning over the deck played by a smart player who has just basic free cards.

This is an useful info for smart people not to expect to be successful in the game just because they are smart. Best cards (regularly creating a deck known to be winning 55% times) and spending tens or even a hundred of hours a month is what gets one to progress in ranked playing or even gets him to achieve the highest rank. Cards + time (to beat the luck) makes 80% of the progress, smartness 20%.

I find the changes to be valid. May the previous editor feel free to present why he thinks it was "Inappropiate and unsourced.". Btw i have achieved the highest legend rank in the game and through that i am an educated source. Couldnt figure out why anyone would find it to be inappropriate aside of being biased and not wanting anyone to mention that the game isnt all perfection always and for everyone same as no game ever is. No doubt on general its a good game.

Regards

Adaimon