User talk:Adam.a.love

Your submission at Articles for creation: Testosterone Isocaproate (January 31)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Testosterone Isocaproate and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Adam.a.love Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Primefac&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Adam.a.love reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 20:54, 31 January 2015 (UTC) Hi, Adam.a.love

This is just a helpful explanatory note to assist you, and avoid the frustrations of repeated rejections in what might prima facie be expected as welcome content. The citation you added does mention Sustanon briefly. However, it's almost completely about fulvestrant, mentioning Sustanon as one of several examples in regards to a narrow aspect of the fulvestrant patent, and in mentioning Sustenon, very limited mention is given to testosterone isocaproate as a component. This level of reference support is not sufficient to meet the wp:n guideline, which is looking for substantial discussion about the topic. You will also have to consider that there is an existing article on Sustanon, even though testosterone isocaproate is a unique chemical subcomonent -. At present, due to an absence of the type of references needed to establish notability, testosterone cypionate, testosterone propionate, and testosterone isocaproate all wp:redirect to testosterone. Testosterone undecanoate doesn't, but it has a specific citation of a review reference. In my experience, the rejection people rarely take enough time to spell things out in a properly helpful way, or give new editors an appropriate helping hand. Perhaps you would like, as an alternative to persisting with testosterone isocaproate right now, to try out a few edits on other topics, which would be really awesome, as a LOT of help is needed. There is a suggestion tool Welcome to wikipedia. FeatherPluma (talk) 16:36, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Testosterone Isocaproate has been accepted
 Testosterone Isocaproate, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! StarryGrandma (talk) 18:15, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Adam.a.love help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.