User talk:Adam2874506

Your post on on IP's talk page re your edit to Beelzebub
You posted a question about the undo of your edit to Beelzebub on an IP's talk page. I have removed the post since that is not the correct place for it (you made the edit with this named account) and you repeated the copyright violation.

Your edit was undone by user:Nthep here as promotional, which it certainly was. Wikipedia is not here to promote the book, and we neutral language. More seriously, you copied the content, in violation of copyright rules. See WP:COPYVIO. As you put it on the IP's page The description is almost verbatim from the summary on the back of the book cited.

And who is the "we" you mention on the IP's page? If you could please let me know what we need to do from regarding getting the most correct and current description of Beelzebub, we would appreciate it. User accounts may not be shared, and it appears that you have some connection to this book or published, and thus have a conflict of interest. Please read and follow WP:COI. Meters (talk) 21:46, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank You Very Much
Dear Wikipedia,

Thank you for getting back to me. It all makes a lot of sense now. I plan to go through the book again and accumulate enough information without breaking any rules.

Afterward, I will submit the summary of my possible addition to the page about 'Beelzebub' to see if it is appropriate. It is all actually a powerful book, and I look forward to getting the most our of the book so that others can benefit from it.

By the way, when I used the term, "we" I was referring to Beelzebub and myself. That is all.

Something did feel a little wrong about what I posted, although I have never posted anything before, so thank you kindly for bringing it to my attention. I understand. Have a great day!

Sincerely, Adam


 * So, you're saying that you have no connection to the book, the writer or the publisher? And I would certainly hope that "Something did feel a little wrong about what I posted" when you made a virtually verbatim copy of promotional material. Meters (talk) 01:54, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I doubt very much that any version of most of that material is going to be acceptable on Wikipedia. Meters (talk) 01:57, 11 March 2021 (UTC)