User talk:Adam Harangozó

Speedy deletion nomination of Love Letter (Metronomy album)
Hello Hadam1,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Love Letter (Metronomy album) for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Benboy00 (talk) 19:28, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The TimeLarks
Hello Adam Harangozó,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The TimeLarks for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Meatsgains (talk) 18:32, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Adam Harangozó! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 14:34, Monday, May 21, 2018 (UTC)

File:V zajeti 00.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 22:54, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Bhimayana.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 23:21, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Auróra moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Auróra, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. signed,Rosguill talk 03:15, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Auróra (November 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Frayae was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Auróra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Auróra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Aur%C3%B3ra Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Frayae&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Aur%C3%B3ra reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

&mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 21:27, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Budapest International Documentary Festival
Hello, Adam Harangozó,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Budapest International Documentary Festival should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Budapest International Documentary Festival.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

 scope_creep Talk  22:18, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Auróra has been accepted
 Auróra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Legacypac (talk) 21:36, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Aur%C3%B3ra help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Non-free rationale for File:V zajeti 00.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:V zajeti 00.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Citrivescence (talk) 23:42, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Auróra) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Auróra.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 19:29, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bidf logo web fekete.png
Thanks for uploading File:Bidf logo web fekete.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of The Alt-Right Playbook for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Alt-Right Playbook is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Alt-Right Playbook until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pudeo (talk) 08:38, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Received e-mail
Dear Adam,

I just received an e-mail from you which raises some questions:
 * If you have a proposal for a specific language-Wikipedia, why don't you post it in the (local) village pump?
 * Why a personal e-mail while it doesn't contain anything that can't be posted in public on a talk page?
 * Why an e-mail to me while it has nothing to do with me personally?

With kind regards &mdash;&#8239;Mar(c).&#8239;&#91;talk&#93; 14:40, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Dear Marc,

This makes it sound like I'm taking part in some punishable conspiracy. It was an email to ask if you're interested in working on this project which requires coding which I can't do sadly. Also, I don't speak the local language so I though it wouldn't be nice to post there in English.

Best. --Adam Harangozó (talk) 20:05, 4 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Dear Adam, thank you for your answer. Not a 'punishable conspiracy'; it just feels quite strange 1. to get approached by e-mail by someone I don't recall working together with before (might as well be my bad memory), 2. to help coding something for a specific language-Wikipedia (and, on top of that, something that wasn't received with enthusiasm elsewhere), 3. without suggesting it to that local community first (using English, being the most widely spoken world language, should be fine on many projects; and it is on 'mine').
 * The idea sounds okay- ish, but I'm not sure if 'my' community would be enthusiastic about it. 'De kroeg' (our 'pub', i.e. our version of the village pump) would the best place to suggest your idea, if you really are determined to pursue this matter, but be prepared to receive negative comments from the always straightforward Dutch people. To answer your question to me: no, I'm not interested in working on this – mainly because I don't have enough time (not by far) to work on all things I am passionate about. Good luck!
 * With kind regards &mdash;&#8239;Mar(c).&#8239;&#91;talk&#93; 13:49, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Bhimayana.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bhimayana.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:38, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Bibliography of online encyclopedias moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Bibliography of online encyclopedias, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:48, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Bibliography of online encyclopedias has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bibliography of online encyclopedias. Thanks! PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:50, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bibliography of online encyclopedias
Hello, Adam Harangozó. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bibliography of online encyclopedias, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bibliography of online encyclopedias


Hello, Adam Harangozó. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bibliography of online encyclopedias".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:53, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

"Education history 1" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Education history 1 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:52, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Tanács/Advice
Lehet, hogy legközelebb olvasnod kellene mielőtt vádaskodni kezdesz/Next time you may want to read before filing accusations. Hihetetlen/Incredible! Borsoka (talk) 15:19, 3 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Dear Borsoka, I brought a potential issue to the attention of admins, I wasn't filing accusations. Adam Harangozó (talk) 15:25, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * What potential issue? You were referring to accusations by banned chauvinistic Romanian editors who wrote of a Hungarian conspiracy against Romanians? I hope next time you will not file accusations against Comet Ping Pong pizzeria for child trafficking, or against Mr Soros for sponsoring plans for white replacement. Borsoka (talk) 15:37, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Your ANI report
As you have had pointed out to you contains links to off-wiki slurs and personal attacks. We shouldn't give them the time of day, and indeed, theer's a current Arbitration committee case ongoing over how we deal with other sites and the dangers of OUTING editors. ——Serial 15:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure what slurs the original article contains but it raises an issue with many edit examples. I think it is detrimental to close a topic when there was no time for arguments to be heard. And your reasoning for closing is misleading regarding the time frame. Adam Harangozó (talk) 15:32, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

NOTAFORUM
Your edits to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject History point to an off-wiki discussion, which is inappropriate. You should instead point to a discussion on-wiki. Further, you ought to read WP:CANVASS and BATTLEFIELD. Do not so arrogantly presume to gather help for your picayune arguments in which you think you need to "win." Wikipedia is about writing an encyclopedia, not pushing political narratives. Chris Troutman ( talk )  17:26, 3 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi @Chris troutman,
 * Sorry for my late reply. I didn't know that an off-wiki discussion can't be pointed out here, even when it's very relevant to the reliability of Wikipedia. I was acting out of concern for using Wiki to spread historical misinformation, as it happened on the Croatian Wikipedia and came up as an issue regarding articles on the Holocaust in Poland. So my concern was for truth and reliable information, otherwise I have no stake in the argument, I don't need to "win". It's possible that I overreacted of course but making the mistake of ignoring such threats to Wikipedia (and attacking those who try to point it out, even if they turn out to be wrong) is actually what can enable bad faith actors to push political narratives through articles. Also, you ought to read WP:CIVIL, WP:GOODFAITH and WP:NOPA before writing on someone's talk page. Adam Harangozó (talk) 08:17, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't assume good faith. AGF is a guideline. WP:IAR is a policy. I accept that you didn't know. Any wiki's goal is to keep readers following internal link after internal link, endlessly. We provide outgoing URLs to references, but never to direct people on-wiki to go off-wiki. Even our meetups in the real world have internal wiki pages. I understand you had concern for people off-wiki collaborating to spread misinformation here. Usually the best thing to do is identify who they are on wiki and then file at WP:COIN. If you don't know exactly which users but you know the page, slap Canvass warning on the article's talk page. If you don't even know what articles are being edited, you can always make a suggestion at The Signpost as they might investigate and write about the problem for the next issue.  Chris Troutman  ( talk )  16:00, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Jelentés
Szia!

Láttam az angol posztot de szerintem innen indult ki. Az egész teljesen érthetetlen, egy hamis hír, szándékos uszítás magyar felhasználók ellen. Mivel mint tudod a magyar történetírás egyáltalán nem fogadja el a dákoromán elméletet, ezért minden magyar azonnal nacionalista lesz a nacionalista románok szemében ha mondjuk átlag magyar nem ért egyet a nacionálkommunista dogmákkal, hogy pl Erdélyt csak 1300 foglalták el a magyarok az őslakos románoktól, Szent István román király volt, stb... Nyilván én is "nacionalista" lettem mert nem engedtem posztolni ezt a hamis térképet  miszerint még Ausztria (Burgenland) és egész Dunántól is ősi román föld 800-1400 között, vagy ezt  ami photoshoppolt térkép a Csaucseszku térképeken alapul hogy 800-1300 között Románia egy olyan nagy ország volt ami a Tiszáig tartott, tiszta történelemhamisítás a magyar történelem ellen hisz ismerjük a nemzetközi térképeket azokból a korokból amik természetesen megegyeznek a magyar történelemoktatással [11][12][13].

Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1073 Ez eleve egy több évvel ezelőtti feljelentés. A megvádolt felhasználók egy része nem is aktív, vagy teljesen más témákat szerkeszt. Vannak a vádlottak között akiknek több mint 10 éves Wiki múltja van, aligha rosszindulatú szerkesztők. A feljelentés egy kb 100 szerkesztéssel rendelkező felhasználó csinálta és nem egy admin ahogy a cikk hamisan állítja mintha admin írta volna, csak annyi hogy az adminokat értesítő oldalon történt a feljelentés. Egyébként elbukott, ha a kommenteket megnézed az adminok szerint alaptalan és még román felhasználók is azt írták hogy nem reális jelentés, inkább boszorkányüldözés magyar felhasználók ellen, sockpuppet gyanú is felmerült. Az is furcsa hogy mégis honnan tudna valaki kibogarászni egy több éves feljelentést az ANI mélyéről, hacsak nem az terjesztette az uszítást a neten most aki korábban csinálta.

Egyébként engem is vádol a feljelentő "bad faith"-el, és kimazsolás pár szerkesztést úgy hogy nem is látja az összefüggést. Pl vádol hogy egy komplett fejezetet tüntettem el a románokkal kapcsolatban [21 ]holott tisztán leírtam a duplázást töröltem, és láthatod az a fejezet még mindig a cikkben van: Vlachs Amúgy a talk pagen válaszoltam is minden "vádpontra" mit miért tettem. OrionNimrod (talk) 19:44, 3 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Én csak azt nem értem hogy a valós tények ellenőrzése vagy ismerete nélkül hogyan lehet elfogadni azonnal igazságként egy neten terjedő infót. OrionNimrod (talk) 20:01, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Szia,
 * Lehet, hogy kevésbé elfogultan kellett volna fogalmaznom. A célom az volt, hogy más szerkesztők is nézzenek rá erre a vitára, lehetőleg olyanok, akik meg tudják ítélni az igazságtartalmát. Nekem nincs elég tudásom, hogy érveljek egyik oldal mellett, érdekem meg csak abban van, hogy minél helyesebben legyen reprezentálva az igazság. Adam Harangozó (talk) 08:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC)