User talk:Adam Krentzman

March 2016
Hello, I'm Tokyogirl79. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''The removed content concerns a lawsuit that was brought to court, so it does merit inclusion in the article. Wikipedia tends to cover "warts and all", so a Wikipedia will include negative coverage as well as positive coverage. You cannot selectively edit an article to only cover the positive material and editing an article in this manner can be seen as Nunnari trying to do image rehabilitation via Wikipedia - which almost always ends extremely badly. Sometimes this is even caught and reported in the media and while this looks to be relatively unlikely in this case, it does happen and it actually makes the person look even worse. It's usually better to just leave the negative content in the article. Also, if you were hired by Nunnari to remove this content then you will need to read over the conflict of interest guidelines. '' Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:24, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If you do represent Nunnari (or were otherwise asked to edit) and he just wants the page removed entirely, that is a possibility but he would have to make the request himself. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:34, 15 March 2016 (UTC)