User talk:Adam Smith is a thief

July 2022
Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because your username, Adam Smith is a thief, does not meet our username policy. Your username is the principal reason for the block. You are welcome to continue editing after you have selected a new username that meets the username policy guidelines, which are summarized below.Per the username policy, a username should represent an individual and should not: represent a group or organization; be promotional; be misleading (such as indicating possession of special user rights or being a "Bot" account (unless approved for such purposes)); be offensive or otherwise disruptive. However, a username that contains the name of a organization and also identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87" is allowed, but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company". Among others, the guidance on conflict of interest and the policy of paid-contribution disclosure are relevant.You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our username policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you wish for your existing contributions to carry over under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:
 * Adding below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" from their talk page.
 * At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a change of name request.
 * Your requested new username cannot already be in use. Therefore, please check the list here to see if a name is taken prior to requesting a change of name.

Appeals: If, after reading the guide to appealing blocks you believe you were blocked in error, then you may appeal this block by adding below this notice. Cabayi (talk) 07:10, 20 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Interesting choice. If "xxx is scum" was a problem, why would you think a criminal allegation like "xxx is a thief" would be better? Cabayi (talk) 07:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Washington Technology University
Your claims, should you choose to make them again, need to be supported by reliable, verifiable, independent sources. Glassdoor reviews are user generated and not acceptable as sources. It's also clear that you have a conflict of interest. You should avoid editing the article directly and confine yourself to requesting edits to the article on its talk page using the edit request wizard. Cabayi (talk) 07:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC)